Skip to content

Conversation

@weiwangmeta
Copy link
Contributor

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Jan 19, 2023

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

1 Ignored Deployment
Name Status Preview Comments Updated
torchci ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Jan 24, 2023 at 8:45PM (UTC)

@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot added the CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. label Jan 19, 2023
@atalman
Copy link
Contributor

atalman commented Jan 24, 2023

We need to remove it from nightly only, please keep it in release. Change similar to CUDA_ACRHES_DICT but for python is required

@malfet
Copy link
Contributor

malfet commented Jan 24, 2023

We need to remove it from nightly only, please keep it in release. Change similar to CUDA_ACRHES_DICT but for python is required

Why? Upcoming release should not have 3.7 and we do not plan 1.13.2, do we? And even if we do, it will not be affected by the change? And going forward, I guess we should either introduce versioned releases to the matrix, or make release builds checkout release branch of this repo

@atalman
Copy link
Contributor

atalman commented Jan 24, 2023

cc @malfet It will automatically remove 3.7 from release validation, if there is regression meanwhile in 1.13.1 (untill we release 2.0) where 3.7 builds will fail for any reason, we will not catch it. Since we claim to support 3.7 for previous release, I would probably tend to stay on safe side. This is the only reason. Its kind of edge case, true.

@malfet
Copy link
Contributor

malfet commented Jan 24, 2023

@atalman an interesting point. Are you saying that our EOL Python matrix should be driven by release cycles?
IMO after it was agreed that 3.7 is heading towards a deprecation, we should not actively seek any fixes for 3.7 specific regressions, should we?

@atalman
Copy link
Contributor

atalman commented Jan 24, 2023

@malfet true we should probably not fix any new issues for 3.7 since we are deprecating it. But its for us to know if we are claiming 3.7 Python support for 1.13, I would expect the installation instructions to still work, specially this is current stable version. If its broken for some reason while we have not released next stable version, it would still be worthwhile to be aware of the breakage and either mitigate it or advise clients.

@weiwangmeta
Copy link
Contributor Author

Should we merge this one or #1475 ?

@weiwangmeta
Copy link
Contributor Author

I will merge #1475 , in future if needed, we can remerge this.

@weiwangmeta
Copy link
Contributor Author

Close this one as #1475 was merged instead of this one.

pytorchmergebot pushed a commit to pytorch/pytorch that referenced this pull request Jan 26, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants