Enable nano.spec layout #106
Closed
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
galak
force-pushed
the
nano-spec
branch
2 times, most recently
from
496f33a to
a94432b
Compare
This was referenced Nov 13, 2019
Pull in a patch to crosstool-ng that adds a config option to match the file layout as expected by nano.spec. Enable this option so that we match behavior with other toolchain builds (ARM GCC embedded, various cross distro toolchains, etc). This paves the way for us to support a different variant build of newlib (a fuller version that doesn't enable the nano options for example). Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <[email protected]>
stephanosio
force-pushed
the
nano-spec
branch
from
a94432b to
337c725
Compare
Member
|
Force pushing to resolve merge conflicts. |
galak
commented
Nov 28, 2019
Contributor
Author
galak
left a comment
galak
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Will hold on this until we have a solution on building 2 newlib variants (nano and full).
Member
working on a PR to crosstool-ng for that at the moment. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Pull in a patch to crosstool-ng that adds a config option to match the
file layout as expected by nano.spec. Enable this option so that we
match behavior with other toolchain builds (ARM GCC embedded, various
cross distro toolchains, etc). This paves the way for us to support a
different variant build of newlib (a fuller version that doesn't enable
the nano options for example).
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala [email protected]