Skip to content

Conversation

@steve-the-edwards
Copy link
Contributor

@steve-the-edwards steve-the-edwards commented May 23, 2025

Fixes #1327

We do rely on covariance for RenderingT for Workflow subtypes that subtype the RenderingT. Also we don't need to remove it due to UnsafeVariance.

Also dropping back down to 2.0.21 from 2.1.21 since that is what we currently use internally and this way we don't have to worry about matching binary compatibility.

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
registry=https://registry.yarnpkg.com No newline at end of file
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Another attempt to try and prevent local config from changing the registry specified by yarn.lock when we regenerate it for new versions. The previous .yarnrc did not work 🤔 . Either way I've manually corrected the yarn.lock again.

We do rely on covariance for `RenderingT` for Workflow subtypes that subtype the `RenderingT`. Also we don't need to remove it due to UnsafeVariance.
@steve-the-edwards steve-the-edwards force-pushed the sedwards/add-render-covariance branch from c653ae3 to 2369102 Compare May 23, 2025 20:01
@steve-the-edwards steve-the-edwards merged commit d7d8a1f into main May 23, 2025
44 checks passed
@steve-the-edwards steve-the-edwards deleted the sedwards/add-render-covariance branch May 23, 2025 20:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Add back covariance for RenderingT

3 participants