[Clang][AMDGPU] Add builtins for instrinsic llvm.amdgcn.raw.buffer.store
#8
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This was referenced Jun 18, 2024
Owner
Author
|
Warning This pull request is not mergeable via GitHub because a downstack PR is open. Once all requirements are satisfied, merge this PR as a stack on Graphite.
This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking. |
shiltian
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 26, 2024
…104523) Compilers and language runtimes often use helper functions that are fundamentally uninteresting when debugging anything but the compiler/runtime itself. This patch introduces a user-extensible mechanism that allows for these frames to be hidden from backtraces and automatically skipped over when navigating the stack with `up` and `down`. This does not affect the numbering of frames, so `f <N>` will still provide access to the hidden frames. The `bt` output will also print a hint that frames have been hidden. My primary motivation for this feature is to hide thunks in the Swift programming language, but I'm including an example recognizer for `std::function::operator()` that I wished for myself many times while debugging LLDB. rdar://126629381 Example output. (Yes, my proof-of-concept recognizer could hide even more frames if we had a method that returned the function name without the return type or I used something that isn't based off regex, but it's really only meant as an example). before: ``` (lldb) thread backtrace --filtered=false * thread #1, queue = 'com.apple.main-thread', stop reason = breakpoint 1.1 * frame #0: 0x0000000100001f04 a.out`foo(x=1, y=1) at main.cpp:4:10 frame #1: 0x0000000100003a00 a.out`decltype(std::declval<int (*&)(int, int)>()(std::declval<int>(), std::declval<int>())) std::__1::__invoke[abi:se200000]<int (*&)(int, int), int, int>(__f=0x000000016fdff280, __args=0x000000016fdff224, __args=0x000000016fdff220) at invoke.h:149:25 frame #2: 0x000000010000399c a.out`int std::__1::__invoke_void_return_wrapper<int, false>::__call[abi:se200000]<int (*&)(int, int), int, int>(__args=0x000000016fdff280, __args=0x000000016fdff224, __args=0x000000016fdff220) at invoke.h:216:12 frame #3: 0x0000000100003968 a.out`std::__1::__function::__alloc_func<int (*)(int, int), std::__1::allocator<int (*)(int, int)>, int (int, int)>::operator()[abi:se200000](this=0x000000016fdff280, __arg=0x000000016fdff224, __arg=0x000000016fdff220) at function.h:171:12 frame #4: 0x00000001000026bc a.out`std::__1::__function::__func<int (*)(int, int), std::__1::allocator<int (*)(int, int)>, int (int, int)>::operator()(this=0x000000016fdff278, __arg=0x000000016fdff224, __arg=0x000000016fdff220) at function.h:313:10 frame #5: 0x0000000100003c38 a.out`std::__1::__function::__value_func<int (int, int)>::operator()[abi:se200000](this=0x000000016fdff278, __args=0x000000016fdff224, __args=0x000000016fdff220) const at function.h:430:12 frame #6: 0x0000000100002038 a.out`std::__1::function<int (int, int)>::operator()(this= Function = foo(int, int) , __arg=1, __arg=1) const at function.h:989:10 frame #7: 0x0000000100001f64 a.out`main(argc=1, argv=0x000000016fdff4f8) at main.cpp:9:10 frame #8: 0x0000000183cdf154 dyld`start + 2476 (lldb) ``` after ``` (lldb) bt * thread #1, queue = 'com.apple.main-thread', stop reason = breakpoint 1.1 * frame #0: 0x0000000100001f04 a.out`foo(x=1, y=1) at main.cpp:4:10 frame #1: 0x0000000100003a00 a.out`decltype(std::declval<int (*&)(int, int)>()(std::declval<int>(), std::declval<int>())) std::__1::__invoke[abi:se200000]<int (*&)(int, int), int, int>(__f=0x000000016fdff280, __args=0x000000016fdff224, __args=0x000000016fdff220) at invoke.h:149:25 frame #2: 0x000000010000399c a.out`int std::__1::__invoke_void_return_wrapper<int, false>::__call[abi:se200000]<int (*&)(int, int), int, int>(__args=0x000000016fdff280, __args=0x000000016fdff224, __args=0x000000016fdff220) at invoke.h:216:12 frame #6: 0x0000000100002038 a.out`std::__1::function<int (int, int)>::operator()(this= Function = foo(int, int) , __arg=1, __arg=1) const at function.h:989:10 frame #7: 0x0000000100001f64 a.out`main(argc=1, argv=0x000000016fdff4f8) at main.cpp:9:10 frame #8: 0x0000000183cdf154 dyld`start + 2476 Note: Some frames were hidden by frame recognizers ```
shiltian
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 12, 2024
…lvm#107294) Random testing revealed it's possible to crash the analyzer with the command line invocation: clang -cc1 -analyze -analyzer-checker=nullability empty.c where the source file, empty.c is an empty source file. ``` clang: <root>/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/CheckerManager.cpp:56: void clang::ento::CheckerManager::finishedCheckerRegistration(): Assertion `Event.second.HasDispatcher && "No dispatcher registered for an event"' failed. PLEASE submit a bug report to https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/ Stack dump: 0. Program arguments: clang -cc1 -analyze -analyzer-checker=nullability nullability-nocrash.c #0 ... ... #7 <addr> clang::ento::CheckerManager::finishedCheckerRegistration() #8 <addr> clang::ento::CheckerManager::CheckerManager(clang::ASTContext&, clang::AnalyzerOptions&, clang::Preprocessor const&, llvm::ArrayRef<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char>>>, llvm::ArrayRef<std::function<void (clang::ento::CheckerRegistry&)>>) ``` This commit removes the assertion which failed here, because it was logically incorrect: it required that if an Event is handled by some (enabled) checker, then there must be an **enabled** checker which can emit that kind of Event. It should be OK to disable the event-producing checkers but enable an event-consuming checker which has different responsibilities in addition to handling the events. Note that this assertion was in an `#ifndef NDEBUG` block, so this change does not impact the non-debug builds. Co-authored-by: Vince Bridgers <[email protected]>
shiltian
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 22, 2025
llvm#123877) Reverts llvm#122811 due to buildbot breakage e.g., https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/52/builds/5421/steps/11/logs/stdio ASan output from local re-run: ``` ==2780289==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: use-after-poison on address 0x7e0b87e28d28 at pc 0x55a979a99e7e bp 0x7ffe4b18f0b0 sp 0x7ffe4b18f0a8 READ of size 1 at 0x7e0b87e28d28 thread T0 #0 0x55a979a99e7d in getStorageClass /usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/Object/COFF.h:344 #1 0x55a979a99e7d in isSectionDefinition /usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/Object/COFF.h:429:9 #2 0x55a979a99e7d in getSymbols /usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm-project/lld/COFF/LLDMapFile.cpp:54:42 #3 0x55a979a99e7d in lld::coff::writeLLDMapFile(lld::coff::COFFLinkerContext const&) /usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm-project/lld/COFF/LLDMapFile.cpp:103:40 #4 0x55a979a16879 in (anonymous namespace)::Writer::run() /usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm-project/lld/COFF/Writer.cpp:810:3 #5 0x55a979a00aac in lld::coff::writeResult(lld::coff::COFFLinkerContext&) /usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm-project/lld/COFF/Writer.cpp:354:15 #6 0x55a97985f7ed in lld::coff::LinkerDriver::linkerMain(llvm::ArrayRef<char const*>) /usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm-project/lld/COFF/Driver.cpp:2826:3 #7 0x55a97984cdd3 in lld::coff::link(llvm::ArrayRef<char const*>, llvm::raw_ostream&, llvm::raw_ostream&, bool, bool) /usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm-project/lld/COFF/Driver.cpp:97:15 #8 0x55a9797f9793 in lld::unsafeLldMain(llvm::ArrayRef<char const*>, llvm::raw_ostream&, llvm::raw_ostream&, llvm::ArrayRef<lld::DriverDef>, bool) /usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm-project/lld/Common/DriverDispatcher.cpp:163:12 llvm#9 0x55a9797fa3b6 in operator() /usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm-project/lld/Common/DriverDispatcher.cpp:188:15 llvm#10 0x55a9797fa3b6 in void llvm::function_ref<void ()>::callback_fn<lld::lldMain(llvm::ArrayRef<char const*>, llvm::raw_ostream&, llvm::raw_ostream&, llvm::ArrayRef<lld::DriverDef>)::$_0>(long) /usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLFunctionalExtras.h:46:12 llvm#11 0x55a97966cb93 in operator() /usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLFunctionalExtras.h:69:12 llvm#12 0x55a97966cb93 in llvm::CrashRecoveryContext::RunSafely(llvm::function_ref<void ()>) /usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/CrashRecoveryContext.cpp:426:3 llvm#13 0x55a9797f9dc3 in lld::lldMain(llvm::ArrayRef<char const*>, llvm::raw_ostream&, llvm::raw_ostream&, llvm::ArrayRef<lld::DriverDef>) /usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm-project/lld/Common/DriverDispatcher.cpp:187:14 llvm#14 0x55a979627512 in lld_main(int, char**, llvm::ToolContext const&) /usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm-project/lld/tools/lld/lld.cpp:103:14 llvm#15 0x55a979628731 in main /usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm_build_asan/tools/lld/tools/lld/lld-driver.cpp:17:10 llvm#16 0x7ffb8b202c89 in __libc_start_call_main csu/../sysdeps/nptl/libc_start_call_main.h:58:16 llvm#17 0x7ffb8b202d44 in __libc_start_main csu/../csu/libc-start.c:360:3 llvm#18 0x55a97953ef60 in _start (/usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm_build_asan/bin/lld+0x8fd1f60) ```
shiltian
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 15, 2025
The mcmodel=tiny memory model is only valid on ARM targets. While trying this on X86 compiler throws an internal error along with stack dump. llvm#125641 This patch resolves the issue. Reduced test case: ``` #include <stdio.h> int main( void ) { printf( "Hello, World!\n" ); return 0; } ``` ``` 0. Program arguments: /opt/compiler-explorer/clang-trunk/bin/clang++ -gdwarf-4 -g -o /app/output.s -fno-verbose-asm -S --gcc-toolchain=/opt/compiler-explorer/gcc-snapshot -fcolor-diagnostics -fno-crash-diagnostics -mcmodel=tiny <source> 1. <eof> parser at end of file #0 0x0000000003b10218 llvm::sys::PrintStackTrace(llvm::raw_ostream&, int) (/opt/compiler-explorer/clang-trunk/bin/clang+++0x3b10218) #1 0x0000000003b0e35c llvm::sys::CleanupOnSignal(unsigned long) (/opt/compiler-explorer/clang-trunk/bin/clang+++0x3b0e35c) #2 0x0000000003a5dbc3 llvm::CrashRecoveryContext::HandleExit(int) (/opt/compiler-explorer/clang-trunk/bin/clang+++0x3a5dbc3) #3 0x0000000003b05cfe llvm::sys::Process::Exit(int, bool) (/opt/compiler-explorer/clang-trunk/bin/clang+++0x3b05cfe) #4 0x0000000000d4e3eb LLVMErrorHandler(void*, char const*, bool) cc1_main.cpp:0:0 #5 0x0000000003a67c93 llvm::report_fatal_error(llvm::Twine const&, bool) (/opt/compiler-explorer/clang-trunk/bin/clang+++0x3a67c93) #6 0x0000000003a67df8 (/opt/compiler-explorer/clang-trunk/bin/clang+++0x3a67df8) #7 0x0000000002549148 llvm::X86TargetMachine::X86TargetMachine(llvm::Target const&, llvm::Triple const&, llvm::StringRef, llvm::StringRef, llvm::TargetOptions const&, std::optional<llvm::Reloc::Model>, std::optional<llvm::CodeModel::Model>, llvm::CodeGenOptLevel, bool) (/opt/compiler-explorer/clang-trunk/bin/clang+++0x2549148) #8 0x00000000025491fc llvm::RegisterTargetMachine<llvm::X86TargetMachine>::Allocator(llvm::Target const&, llvm::Triple const&, llvm::StringRef, llvm::StringRef, llvm::TargetOptions const&, std::optional<llvm::Reloc::Model>, std::optional<llvm::CodeModel::Model>, llvm::CodeGenOptLevel, bool) (/opt/compiler-explorer/clang-trunk/bin/clang+++0x25491fc) llvm#9 0x0000000003db74cc clang::emitBackendOutput(clang::CompilerInstance&, clang::CodeGenOptions&, llvm::StringRef, llvm::Module*, clang::BackendAction, llvm::IntrusiveRefCntPtr<llvm::vfs::FileSystem>, std::unique_ptr<llvm::raw_pwrite_stream, std::default_delete<llvm::raw_pwrite_stream>>, clang::BackendConsumer*) (/opt/compiler-explorer/clang-trunk/bin/clang+++0x3db74cc) llvm#10 0x0000000004460d95 clang::BackendConsumer::HandleTranslationUnit(clang::ASTContext&) (/opt/compiler-explorer/clang-trunk/bin/clang+++0x4460d95) llvm#11 0x00000000060005ec clang::ParseAST(clang::Sema&, bool, bool) (/opt/compiler-explorer/clang-trunk/bin/clang+++0x60005ec) llvm#12 0x00000000044614b5 clang::CodeGenAction::ExecuteAction() (/opt/compiler-explorer/clang-trunk/bin/clang+++0x44614b5) llvm#13 0x0000000004737121 clang::FrontendAction::Execute() (/opt/compiler-explorer/clang-trunk/bin/clang+++0x4737121) llvm#14 0x00000000046b777b clang::CompilerInstance::ExecuteAction(clang::FrontendAction&) (/opt/compiler-explorer/clang-trunk/bin/clang+++0x46b777b) llvm#15 0x00000000048229e3 clang::ExecuteCompilerInvocation(clang::CompilerInstance*) (/opt/compiler-explorer/clang-trunk/bin/clang+++0x48229e3) llvm#16 0x0000000000d50621 cc1_main(llvm::ArrayRef<char const*>, char const*, void*) (/opt/compiler-explorer/clang-trunk/bin/clang+++0xd50621) llvm#17 0x0000000000d48e2d ExecuteCC1Tool(llvm::SmallVectorImpl<char const*>&, llvm::ToolContext const&) driver.cpp:0:0 llvm#18 0x00000000044acc99 void llvm::function_ref<void ()>::callback_fn<clang::driver::CC1Command::Execute(llvm::ArrayRef<std::optional<llvm::StringRef>>, std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char>>*, bool*) const::'lambda'()>(long) Job.cpp:0:0 llvm#19 0x0000000003a5dac3 llvm::CrashRecoveryContext::RunSafely(llvm::function_ref<void ()>) (/opt/compiler-explorer/clang-trunk/bin/clang+++0x3a5dac3) llvm#20 0x00000000044aceb9 clang::driver::CC1Command::Execute(llvm::ArrayRef<std::optional<llvm::StringRef>>, std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char>>*, bool*) const (.part.0) Job.cpp:0:0 llvm#21 0x00000000044710dd clang::driver::Compilation::ExecuteCommand(clang::driver::Command const&, clang::driver::Command const*&, bool) const (/opt/compiler-explorer/clang-trunk/bin/clang+++0x44710dd) llvm#22 0x0000000004472071 clang::driver::Compilation::ExecuteJobs(clang::driver::JobList const&, llvm::SmallVectorImpl<std::pair<int, clang::driver::Command const*>>&, bool) const (/opt/compiler-explorer/clang-trunk/bin/clang+++0x4472071) llvm#23 0x000000000447c3fc clang::driver::Driver::ExecuteCompilation(clang::driver::Compilation&, llvm::SmallVectorImpl<std::pair<int, clang::driver::Command const*>>&) (/opt/compiler-explorer/clang-trunk/bin/clang+++0x447c3fc) llvm#24 0x0000000000d4d2b1 clang_main(int, char**, llvm::ToolContext const&) (/opt/compiler-explorer/clang-trunk/bin/clang+++0xd4d2b1) llvm#25 0x0000000000c12464 main (/opt/compiler-explorer/clang-trunk/bin/clang+++0xc12464) llvm#26 0x00007ae43b029d90 (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x29d90) llvm#27 0x00007ae43b029e40 __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x29e40) llvm#28 0x0000000000d488c5 _start (/opt/compiler-explorer/clang-trunk/bin/clang+++0xd488c5) ``` --------- Co-authored-by: Shashwathi N <[email protected]>
shiltian
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 23, 2025
**Mitigation for:** google/sanitizers#749 **Disclosure:** I'm not an ASan compiler expert yet (I'm trying to learn!), I primarily work in the runtime. Some of this PR was developed with the help of AI tools (primarily as a "fuzzy `grep` engine"), but I've manually refined and tested the output, and can speak for every line. In general, I used it only to orient myself and for "rubberducking". **Context:** The msvc ASan team (👋 ) has received an internal request to improve clang's exception handling under ASan for Windows. Namely, we're interested in **mitigating** this bug: google/sanitizers#749 To summarize, today, clang + ASan produces a false-positive error for this program: ```C++ #include <cstdio> #include <exception> int main() { try { throw std::exception("test"); }catch (const std::exception& ex){ puts(ex.what()); } return 0; } ``` The error reads as such: ``` C:\Users\dajusto\source\repros\upstream>type main.cpp #include <cstdio> #include <exception> int main() { try { throw std::exception("test"); }catch (const std::exception& ex){ puts(ex.what()); } return 0; } C:\Users\dajusto\source\repros\upstream>"C:\Users\dajusto\source\repos\llvm-project\build.runtimes\bin\clang.exe" -fsanitize=address -g -O0 main.cpp C:\Users\dajusto\source\repros\upstream>a.exe ================================================================= ==19112==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: access-violation on unknown address 0x000000000000 (pc 0x7ff72c7c11d9 bp 0x0080000ff960 sp 0x0080000fcf50 T0) ==19112==The signal is caused by a READ memory access. ==19112==Hint: address points to the zero page. #0 0x7ff72c7c11d8 in main C:\Users\dajusto\source\repros\upstream\main.cpp:8 #1 0x7ff72c7d479f in _CallSettingFrame C:\repos\msvc\src\vctools\crt\vcruntime\src\eh\amd64\handlers.asm:49 #2 0x7ff72c7c8944 in __FrameHandler3::CxxCallCatchBlock(struct _EXCEPTION_RECORD *) C:\repos\msvc\src\vctools\crt\vcruntime\src\eh\frame.cpp:1567 #3 0x7ffb4a90e3e5 (C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM32\ntdll.dll+0x18012e3e5) #4 0x7ff72c7c1128 in main C:\Users\dajusto\source\repros\upstream\main.cpp:6 #5 0x7ff72c7c33db in invoke_main C:\repos\msvc\src\vctools\crt\vcstartup\src\startup\exe_common.inl:78 #6 0x7ff72c7c33db in __scrt_common_main_seh C:\repos\msvc\src\vctools\crt\vcstartup\src\startup\exe_common.inl:288 #7 0x7ffb49b05c06 (C:\WINDOWS\System32\KERNEL32.DLL+0x180035c06) #8 0x7ffb4a8455ef (C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM32\ntdll.dll+0x1800655ef) ==19112==Register values: rax = 0 rbx = 80000ff8e0 rcx = 27d76d00000 rdx = 80000ff8e0 rdi = 80000fdd50 rsi = 80000ff6a0 rbp = 80000ff960 rsp = 80000fcf50 r8 = 100 r9 = 19930520 r10 = 8000503a90 r11 = 80000fd540 r12 = 80000fd020 r13 = 0 r14 = 80000fdeb8 r15 = 0 AddressSanitizer can not provide additional info. SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: access-violation C:\Users\dajusto\source\repros\upstream\main.cpp:8 in main ==19112==ABORTING ``` The root of the issue _appears to be_ that ASan's instrumentation is incompatible with Window's assumptions for instantiating `catch`-block's parameters (`ex` in the snippet above). The nitty gritty details are lost on me, but I understand that to make this work without loss of ASan coverage, a "serious" refactoring is needed. In the meantime, users risk false positive errors when pairing ASan + catch-block parameters on Windows. **To mitigate this** I think we should avoid instrumenting catch-block parameters on Windows. It appears to me this is as "simple" as marking catch block parameters as "uninteresting" in `AddressSanitizer::isInterestingAlloca`. My manual tests seem to confirm this. I believe this is strictly better than today's status quo, where the runtime generates false positives. Although we're now explicitly choosing to instrument less, the benefit is that now more programs can run with ASan without _funky_ macros that disable ASan on exception blocks. **This PR:** implements the mitigation above, and creates a simple new test for it. _Thanks!_ --------- Co-authored-by: Antonio Frighetto <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.