Skip to content

Conversation

ckipp01
Copy link
Member

@ckipp01 ckipp01 commented May 9, 2023

This change just make sure the actual behavior is aligned with the comments about plugin options.

refs #17238

@anatoliykmetyuk
Copy link
Contributor

@liufengyun would you be able to review this one?

This just makes a small update to the scaladocs to align what actually
happens with what the comments say. Currently the comments are incorrect
as passing in `-P:plugname:opt1,opt2` becomes List(opt1, opt2)` does not
become `List(opt1, opt2)`.

refs scala#17238
@ckipp01 ckipp01 force-pushed the compilerPluginOptions branch from c9d669f to 4ffc391 Compare May 18, 2023 09:26
@ckipp01 ckipp01 changed the title fix: make sure we split compiler plugin options on , fix(scaladocs): make sure scaladocs are aligned with actual behavior May 18, 2023
@ckipp01 ckipp01 requested a review from liufengyun May 18, 2023 09:28
Copy link
Contributor

@liufengyun liufengyun left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thank you @ckipp01 👍

@ckipp01 ckipp01 merged commit cbf1f18 into scala:main May 19, 2023
@ckipp01 ckipp01 deleted the compilerPluginOptions branch May 19, 2023 06:37
G1ng3r pushed a commit to G1ng3r/dotty that referenced this pull request Sep 10, 2023
…cala#17448)

This change just make sure the actual behavior is aligned with the
comments about plugin options.

refs scala#17238
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants