Skip to content

Conversation

steveklabnik
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes #19321

... I think? make check passes, but I'm not 100% sure that there's a test for that behavior. Thoughts?

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @nikomatsakis

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@nikomatsakis
Copy link
Contributor

I know nothing of this hack. @alexcrichton do you? I'm inclined to just r+ and see what happens, I guess.

@nikomatsakis
Copy link
Contributor

@bors r+ eeee0e8 rollup

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

Hm yes I do think we take care of this use case now. At least if it doesn't bounce on the bots it works for me!

Manishearth added a commit to Manishearth/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 17, 2015
Fixes rust-lang#19321

... I think? `make check` passes, but I'm not 100% sure that there's a test for that behavior. Thoughts?
@huonw huonw merged commit eeee0e8 into rust-lang:master Feb 18, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

No longer need librustc_llvm::static_link_hack_this_sucks?
5 participants