-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.8k
Fix the bevy implied bounds hack for the next solver #147184
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
lcnr
reviewed
Sep 30, 2025
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
r=me after nits
compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/traits/query/type_op/implied_outlives_bounds.rs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
@bors delegate+ |
✌️ @jdonszelmann, you can now approve this pull request! If @lcnr told you to " |
881a035
to
3c566eb
Compare
lcnr
reviewed
Sep 30, 2025
compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/traits/query/type_op/implied_outlives_bounds.rs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
3c566eb
to
80e598b
Compare
@bors r=lcnr |
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 30, 2025
Rollup of 6 pull requests Successful merges: - #143069 (Add fast-path for accessing the current thread id) - #146518 (Improve the documentation around `ZERO_AR_DATE`) - #146596 (Add a dummy codegen backend) - #146617 (Don’t suggest foreign `doc(hidden)` types in "the following other types implement trait" diagnostics) - #146635 (cg_llvm: Stop using `as_c_char_ptr` for coverage-related bindings) - #147184 (Fix the bevy implied bounds hack for the next solver) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 1, 2025
Rollup of 6 pull requests Successful merges: - #143069 (Add fast-path for accessing the current thread id) - #146518 (Improve the documentation around `ZERO_AR_DATE`) - #146596 (Add a dummy codegen backend) - #146617 (Don’t suggest foreign `doc(hidden)` types in "the following other types implement trait" diagnostics) - #146635 (cg_llvm: Stop using `as_c_char_ptr` for coverage-related bindings) - #147184 (Fix the bevy implied bounds hack for the next solver) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
rust-timer
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 1, 2025
Rollup merge of #147184 - jdonszelmann:bevy-outlives-bound, r=lcnr Fix the bevy implied bounds hack for the next solver The diff is trivial, of course, and basically what you already suggested. Mostly dug around a bunch to learn. I hope this is roughly what you had in mind. Fixes rust-lang/trait-system-refactor-initiative#236. r? `@lcnr`
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The diff is trivial, of course, and basically what you already suggested. Mostly dug around a bunch to learn. I hope this is roughly what you had in mind.
Fixes rust-lang/trait-system-refactor-initiative#236.
r? @lcnr