Skip to content

Conversation

rschoon
Copy link
Contributor

@rschoon rschoon commented Oct 6, 2020

Not much to say here, other than it includes an update for a breaking change from rustc_ast

changelog: none

pnkfelix and others added 5 commits October 4, 2020 13:14
That is, this changes `#[forbid(foo)] #[allow(foo)]` from allowing foo to
forbidding foo.
…e-forbid-in-same-scope, r=petrochenkov

Disallow overriding forbid in same scope

Rebased #73379.

Fixes #70819.
Fix LitKind's byte buffer to use refcounted slice

While working on adding a new lint for clippy (see #6044) for avoiding shared ownership of "mutable buffer" types (such as using `Rc<Vec<T>>` instead of `Rc<[T]>`), I noticed a type exported from rustc_ast and used by clippy gets caught by the lint. This PR fixes the exported type.

This PR includes the actual change to clippy too, but I will open a PR directly against clippy for that part (although it will currently fail to build there).
@rust-highfive
Copy link

r? @Manishearth

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties label Oct 6, 2020
@Manishearth
Copy link
Member

r? @flip1995 just in case you also have sync plans

@rust-highfive rust-highfive assigned flip1995 and unassigned Manishearth Oct 6, 2020
@Manishearth
Copy link
Member

Actually, this seems fine

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 6, 2020

📌 Commit 18db93d has been approved by Manishearth

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 6, 2020

⌛ Testing commit 18db93d with merge bc0251c...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 6, 2020
Sync from rust

Not much to say here, other than it includes an update for a breaking change from rustc_ast

changelog: none
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 6, 2020

💔 Test failed - checks-action_test

@flip1995 flip1995 mentioned this pull request Oct 6, 2020
@flip1995
Copy link
Member

flip1995 commented Oct 6, 2020

Thanks for syncing. Between the sync and the bors run was another breakage. I resynced and opened #6126. Help in the sync process is always welcome though!

@flip1995 flip1995 closed this Oct 6, 2020
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 6, 2020
Rustup

Supersedes #6121. There was another breakage.

r? `@ghost`

changelog: none
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants