Skip to content

Conversation

tesuji
Copy link
Contributor

@tesuji tesuji commented Oct 22, 2019

changelog: none

@tesuji tesuji force-pushed the no-reinstall-toolchain branch from 0515464 to f9d2a1f Compare October 22, 2019 08:49
@flip1995 flip1995 added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties label Oct 22, 2019
@matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member

When I run git ls-remote https://github.com/rust-lang/rust master it can sometimes take several 10s of seconds to execute. Is anyone else getting that?

git ls-remote https://github.com/rust-lang/rust master  0,17s user 0,10s system 0% cpu 53,640 total

@phansch
Copy link
Contributor

phansch commented Oct 24, 2019

When I run git ls-remote https://github.com/rust-lang/rust master it can sometimes take several 10s of seconds to execute. Is anyone else getting that?

git ls-remote https://github.com/rust-lang/rust master  0,17s user 0,10s system 0% cpu 53,640 total

Yes, I can also reproduce this. About 5% of the time it will take 10+ seconds to get the result. On my slow 20Mbps connection this PR is still a significant speed up currently.

Also considering that it isn't always that slow, I'd say it's fine to merge this?

@tesuji tesuji force-pushed the no-reinstall-toolchain branch from f9d2a1f to e780756 Compare October 24, 2019 09:37
@tesuji
Copy link
Contributor Author

tesuji commented Oct 24, 2019

Note that old commit used git : https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/blob/3fb497c8c860cb286ed59fa49bc1796086196697/setup-toolchain.sh.
Also, rustup-toolchain-install-master uses git internally when not providing rust commit: https://github.com/kennytm/rustup-toolchain-install-master/blob/bcfef70d00feb43fbaa865cbef005ca176883c11/src/main.rs#L297-L305

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 24, 2019

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #4650) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@tesuji tesuji force-pushed the no-reinstall-toolchain branch 3 times, most recently from 608e2d0 to 6193b36 Compare October 24, 2019 14:59
@tesuji
Copy link
Contributor Author

tesuji commented Oct 24, 2019

Ci passed

@phansch
Copy link
Contributor

phansch commented Oct 24, 2019

@bors r+ thanks!

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 24, 2019

📌 Commit 6193b36 has been approved by phansch

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 24, 2019

🌲 The tree is currently closed for pull requests below priority 10, this pull request will be tested once the tree is reopened

@phansch
Copy link
Contributor

phansch commented Oct 24, 2019

@bors treeclose-

@phansch
Copy link
Contributor

phansch commented Oct 24, 2019

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 24, 2019

💡 This pull request was already approved, no need to approve it again.

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 24, 2019

📌 Commit 6193b36 has been approved by phansch

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 24, 2019

🌲 The tree is currently closed for pull requests below priority 10, this pull request will be tested once the tree is reopened

@phansch
Copy link
Contributor

phansch commented Oct 24, 2019

@bors treeclosed-

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 24, 2019
build: do not reinstall master toolchain if it is up-to-date

changelog: none
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 24, 2019

⌛ Testing commit 6193b36 with merge 37ea436...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 24, 2019

☀️ Test successful - checks-travis, status-appveyor
Approved by: phansch
Pushing 37ea436 to master...

@bors bors merged commit 6193b36 into rust-lang:master Oct 24, 2019
@tesuji tesuji deleted the no-reinstall-toolchain branch October 24, 2019 17:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants