Skip to content

Conversation

@jackkleeman
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes #72

Copy link
Contributor

@tillrohrmann tillrohrmann left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I've got a quick question regarding the dependency among the two jobs.

@jackkleeman jackkleeman force-pushed the e2e-workflow-call branch 2 times, most recently from 9459934 to 3286fe8 Compare June 2, 2023 16:55
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jun 3, 2023

Test Results

  71 files    71 suites   8m 40s ⏱️
  58 tests   57 ✔️ 1 💤 0
151 runs  150 ✔️ 1 💤 0

Results for commit 942668d.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

@jackkleeman jackkleeman force-pushed the e2e-workflow-call branch 4 times, most recently from baa5274 to 27679de Compare June 5, 2023 08:27
Copy link
Contributor

@tillrohrmann tillrohrmann left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. +1 for merging once the required PR for the e2e tests has been merged.

@jackkleeman jackkleeman merged commit b95bc1e into main Jun 8, 2023
@jackkleeman jackkleeman deleted the e2e-workflow-call branch June 8, 2023 11:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Run e2e tests on PRs

3 participants