Skip to content

Conversation

@nealrichardson
Copy link
Contributor

Intent

Resolves #469

Type of Change

  • Bug Fix
  • New Feature
  • Breaking Change

Automated Tests

Have not yet added a test, wasn't sure where it should go, but happy to add one.

Checklist

  • I have updated CHANGELOG.md to cover notable changes.
  • I have updated all related GitHub issues to reflect their current state.

@aronatkins
Copy link
Collaborator

@mmarchetti also mentioned that #207 needed to merge; we may need both changes.

@aronatkins aronatkins requested a review from mmarchetti August 30, 2023 20:01
Copy link
Contributor

@mmarchetti mmarchetti left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The change looks good. There are some unrelated CI issues we will need to look into before merging.

@mmarchetti
Copy link
Contributor

The CI issues are because repo secrets aren't available when running actions from a fork. I gave you write access to the repo and also created a local branch from the one in this PR. I think a PR will need to be opened from the local branch in order to pass CI.

@mmarchetti
Copy link
Contributor

Closing in favor of #472

@mmarchetti mmarchetti closed this Sep 5, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Windows virtualenvs are not excluded

3 participants