Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Nov 16, 2023. It is now read-only.

Removed "Jackson" from the page #64

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Removed "Jackson" from the page #64

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion infrastructure/README.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@

# Project Jackson Infrastructure
# Project Infrastructure

This repository includes the ARM templates for Project Jackson.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @SharePointing - If we're going to take this change, there are some other places throughout the docs that should have this removed as well - like this one

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I guess we have to decide - is it Project Jackson or "Containers Rest Cosmos Java"

I was just simplifying to "Project in the generic sense"

Happy to leave it be if we want it to be consistent, I'm just starting to point people here as reference sometimes

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@code4clouds can you comment on the overall project goal? If we want to rebrand we should book the overall work to do so, rather than asking @SharePointing to do it here. 😃

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yes, as far as rebranding we also have a discussion going on on this issue about changing/shortening the repo title name, maybe if we come to a conclusion on that we could do this in the same go?

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Seems a legit plan.

I'm all for efficient.


Expand Down