Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Nov 16, 2023. It is now read-only.

Conversation

@SharePointing
Copy link

Just cleaning up the "Project Jackson" indicator.

Changed it to "Project"

Just cleaning up the "Project Jackson" indicator. 

Changed it to "Project"
Copy link

@Smarker Smarker left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@bengreenier bengreenier added bug Something isn't working Documentation Changes to documentation or otherwise textual, descriptive based material labels Jan 14, 2019
@bengreenier bengreenier self-assigned this Jan 14, 2019
Copy link
Contributor

@bengreenier bengreenier left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think it's probably best that if we remove this here, we remove it from some other places at the same time. @SharePointing can you comment on the goal here? I think there's a chance you're just trying to align the header to the directory purpose? if that's the case we can make it infrastructure and take this without changing the other "project jackson" references

# Project Jackson Infrastructure
# Project Infrastructure

This repository includes the ARM templates for Project Jackson.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @SharePointing - If we're going to take this change, there are some other places throughout the docs that should have this removed as well - like this one

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I guess we have to decide - is it Project Jackson or "Containers Rest Cosmos Java"

I was just simplifying to "Project in the generic sense"

Happy to leave it be if we want it to be consistent, I'm just starting to point people here as reference sometimes

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@code4clouds can you comment on the overall project goal? If we want to rebrand we should book the overall work to do so, rather than asking @SharePointing to do it here. 😃

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yes, as far as rebranding we also have a discussion going on on this issue about changing/shortening the repo title name, maybe if we come to a conclusion on that we could do this in the same go?

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Seems a legit plan.

I'm all for efficient.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

bug Something isn't working Documentation Changes to documentation or otherwise textual, descriptive based material

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants