fix(app, android): react-native 0.65 compatibility

[mikehardy]

Description

As discovered by @wfern we appear to have a missing couple of APIs needed by react-native 0.65

This will hopefully fix that

Test Plan

Hopefully someone can try the patch set (available from this URL - https://github.com/invertase/react-native-firebase/suites/3536859145/artifacts/84635700 - grabbed from the "artifacts" dropdown from the details link on the patches action below 👇 ) - integrate it with https://github.com/ds300/patch-package and should work?

Related issues

Fixes #5614

Release Summary

conventional commits --> rebase merge

Checklist

• I read the Contributor Guide and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs.
  • Yes
• My change supports the following platforms;
  • Android
  • iOS
• My change includes tests;
  • e2e tests added or updated in packages/\*\*/e2e
  • jest tests added or updated in packages/\*\*/__tests__
• I have updated TypeScript types that are affected by my change.
• This is a breaking change;
  • Yes
  • No

---

Think react-native-firebase is great? Please consider supporting the project with any of the below:

• 👉 Star this repo on GitHub ⭐️
• 👉 Follow React Native Firebase and Invertase on Twitter

[vercel]

This pull request is being automatically deployed with Vercel (learn more).
To see the status of your deployments, click below or on the icon next to each commit.

react-native-firebase – ./

🔍 Inspect: https://vercel.com/invertase/react-native-firebase/EcTJoDgik3WYtz2r82rfozqnvm1B
✅ Preview: https://react-native-firebase-git-mikehardy-rn65-compa-a42069-invertase.vercel.app

react-native-firebase-next – ./website_modular

🔍 Inspect: https://vercel.com/invertase/react-native-firebase-next/3G4gWo7k1EBB5qrE5tqHTkdmHVB7
✅ Preview: Canceled

[Deployment for acfc895 canceled]

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #5616 (a0ef0e8) into master (8bd3a1c) will decrease coverage by 19.43%.
The diff coverage is 60.00%.

❗ Current head a0ef0e8 differs from pull request most recent head acfc895. Consider uploading reports for the commit acfc895 to get more accurate results

@@              Coverage Diff              @@
##             master    #5616       +/-   ##
=============================================
- Coverage     73.11%   53.68%   -19.42%     
- Complexity        0      631      +631     
=============================================
  Files           109      208       +99     
  Lines          4476    10076     +5600     
  Branches        954     1543      +589     
=============================================
+ Hits           3272     5408     +2136     
- Misses         1126     4384     +3258     
- Partials         78      284      +206     

[wfern]

Yes, that's exactly what I meant. I tested it the way you described here and everything works fine.
Thank you very much for creating the pull-request.

[mikehardy]

It's about to be my overnight here so I won't be able to test it for a little while but I'll merge + release tomorrow if everything goes well, while working through #5611

[mikehardy]

upstream react-native re-wrote the EventEmitter infrastructure, and it's not too hard to work with the new style for RN65+ but it's a bit touchy to handle either RN <= 64 and RN >= 65 at the same time, working through that now then I can release