Skip to content

Conversation

uditagarwal97
Copy link
Contributor

It's a part of larger refactoring effort to pass adapter via reference instead of pointer everywhere in the codebase.

Follow-up of:
#19186
#19184
#19187
#19202

@uditagarwal97 uditagarwal97 merged commit b707123 into sycl Jul 4, 2025
25 checks passed
@uditagarwal97 uditagarwal97 deleted the private/udit/adapterref5 branch July 4, 2025 14:24
uditagarwal97 added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 7, 2025
…9312)

It's a part of larger refactoring effort to pass adapter via reference
instead of pointer everywhere in the codebase.

Follow-up of:
#19186
#19184
#19187
#19202
#19299
uditagarwal97 added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 8, 2025
)

It's a part of larger refactoring effort to pass adapter via reference
instead of pointer everywhere in the codebase.

Follow-up of:
#19186
#19184
#19187
#19202
#19299
#19312
uditagarwal97 added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 9, 2025
…Adapter()` return by reference (#19314)

It's a part of larger refactoring effort to pass adapter via reference
instead of pointer everywhere in the codebase.

Follow-up of:
#19186
#19184
#19187
#19202
#19299
#19312
#19313
uditagarwal97 added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 10, 2025
It's a part of larger refactoring effort to pass adapter via reference
instead of pointer everywhere in the codebase.

Follow-up of:
#19186
#19184
#19187
#19202
#19299
#19312
#19313
#19314
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants