Skip to content

Conversation

@prolsen
Copy link

@prolsen prolsen commented Nov 15, 2025

No description provided.

@google-cla
Copy link

google-cla bot commented Nov 15, 2025

Thanks for your pull request! It looks like this may be your first contribution to a Google open source project. Before we can look at your pull request, you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA).

View this failed invocation of the CLA check for more information.

For the most up to date status, view the checks section at the bottom of the pull request.

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @prolsen, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request addresses a potential runtime IndexError within the _run_async_impl function of the llm_agent.py file. By adding a simple conditional check, the change ensures that the code safely accesses list elements, thereby enhancing the stability and robustness of the ParallelAgent component and preventing unexpected crashes in specific scenarios.

Highlights

  • Error Prevention: Introduced a length check for the events list to prevent an IndexError when attempting to access events[-2] if the list contains fewer than two elements.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

The pull request correctly fixes a potential IndexError by adding a length check before accessing events[-2]. I've also suggested a small refactoring to make the condition more concise and Pythonic using slicing and any(), which also handles edge cases gracefully.

Comment on lines 472 to 475
if events and (
ctx.should_pause_invocation(events[-1])
or ctx.should_pause_invocation(events[-2])
or (len(events) >= 2 and ctx.should_pause_invocation(events[-2]))
):
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

While the fix is correct, the logic to check the last two events can be simplified and made more robust using a slice and any(). This avoids manual length checks and is more idiomatic. Using [::-1] on the slice preserves the evaluation order of checking the last event first.

      if any(ctx.should_pause_invocation(event) for event in events[-2:][::-1]):

@adk-bot adk-bot added the core [Component] This issue is related to the core interface and implementation label Nov 15, 2025
@adk-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

adk-bot commented Nov 15, 2025

Response from ADK Triaging Agent

Hello @prolsen, thank you for your contribution!

Before we can merge your pull request, we need to ask you to do the following:

  • Sign the Contributor License Agreement (CLA): It seems like you haven't signed the CLA yet. You can do so by following the instructions in the "cla/google" check at the bottom of this page.
  • Provide more context: This PR is a bug fix. Could you please either create a GitHub issue that this PR addresses and link it here, or describe the bug in the PR description?
  • Add a testing plan: Please add a "Testing Plan" section to your PR description to explain how you've tested these changes.
  • Provide evidence of the fix: For bug fixes, it's very helpful to include logs or screenshots that demonstrate the fix.

You can find more details in our contribution guidelines.

Thank you!

@ryanaiagent ryanaiagent self-assigned this Nov 18, 2025
@ryanaiagent
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi @prolsen ,Thank you for your contribution! It appears you haven't yet signed the Contributor License Agreement (CLA). Please visit https://cla.developers.google.com/ to complete the signing process. Once the CLA is signed, we'll be able to proceed with the review of your PR. Thank you!

@ryanaiagent ryanaiagent added the request clarification [Status] The maintainer need clarification or more information from the author label Nov 18, 2025
@prolsen prolsen closed this by deleting the head repository Nov 20, 2025
@ryanaiagent ryanaiagent removed the request clarification [Status] The maintainer need clarification or more information from the author label Nov 21, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

core [Component] This issue is related to the core interface and implementation

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants