Skip to content

Conversation

@remidewitte
Copy link
Contributor

@remidewitte remidewitte commented Apr 3, 2024

PR for #47 .

A reflexion is that RouteDefinition could rather be because in the context of the compiler I think the compiler would never be called if the schema is undefined and most of the time url, method and httpStatus are not used :

export type RouteDefinition = {
    method?: string;
    url?: string;
    httpStatus?: string;
    schema: unknown;
  }

And if used with reply.getSerializationFunction or reply.compileSerializationSchema they can be undefined :

.getSerializationFunction(schema | httpStatus, [contentType]) - Returns the serialization function for the specified schema or http status, if any of either are set.
.compileSerializationSchema(schema, [httpStatus], [contentType]) - Compiles the specified schema and returns a serialization function using the default (or customized) SerializerCompiler. The optional httpStatus is forwarded to the SerializerCompiler if provided, default to undefined.

What do you think ?

Checklist

@Eomm Eomm linked an issue Apr 3, 2024 that may be closed by this pull request
2 tasks
Copy link
Member

@mcollina mcollina left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@Uzlopak
Copy link
Contributor

Uzlopak commented Dec 8, 2024

I adapted the linting issues, but you decide

@Uzlopak Uzlopak merged commit 9b55cf4 into fastify:main Dec 11, 2024
11 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Is type SerializerCompiler correct ?

4 participants