Append "Superchain" to interop/interoperability

[krofax]

Description

Appended "Superchain" to interop/interoperability

Tests

Additional context

Metadata

[netlify]

✅ Deploy Preview for docs-optimism ready!

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	caa15df
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/sites/docs-optimism/deploys/67ab9e755dddfc0008591faf
😎 Deploy Preview	https://deploy-preview-1350--docs-optimism.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile	Toggle QR Code... Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

---

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

[coderabbitai]

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

This pull request updates several JSON metadata files that structure documentation pages. The changes primarily involve renaming the “interop” key’s value from “Interoperability” to “Superchain interoperability” across multiple pages. In addition, the PR introduces new separator sections for better organization: for example, new entries such as "+++ Tutorials" and "+++ DevTools" are added, and the titles for existing “Tutorials” and “DevTools” sections have been cleared. A similar update is applied in the get-started documentation where the "BuilderGuides" section is replaced, and the stack documentation now includes a new “Experimental” separator. An adjustment is also made in the stack interop metadata where the explainer text is updated to “Superchain interop explainer.” These modifications affect only the labeling and structure of the documentation without changing any underlying functionality.

Possibly related PRs

• Update explainer.mdx #907: Updates the term from “Interoperability” to “Superchain interoperability” reflecting similar changes in key documentation labels.
• dropping OPM down #1085: Modifies the “interop” key in both app-developers and get-started metadata files, aligning with the changes in this PR.
• Deploy assets using Superchain ERC20 #1050: Targets similar modifications in the pages/stack/interop/_meta.json file, updating the interoperability terminology.

Suggested labels

documentation

Suggested reviewers

• bradleycamacho
• zainbacchus

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[zainbacchus]

lgtm

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)

pages/get-started/_meta.json (1)

14-21: Consider removing redundant section separators.

The BuilderGuides section has both +++ and --- separators with different titles, which might cause confusion in the documentation navigation.

Consider keeping only one separator:

-    "+++ BuilderGuides": {
-        "title": "",
-        "type": "separator"
-      },
     "--- BuilderGuides": {
        "title": "Builder Guides",
        "type": "separator"
      },

pages/app-developers/_meta.json (1)

13-32: Simplify section separators for better navigation.

The current structure has:

1. Duplicate separators (+++ and ---) for both Tutorials and DevTools sections
2. Empty titles in some separators

This might make the documentation navigation less intuitive.

Consider simplifying to a single separator per section:

-    "+++ Tutorials": {
-      "title": "",
-      "type": "separator"
-    },
     "--- Tutorials": {
       "title": "Tutorials",
       "type": "separator"
     },
     "tutorials": {
       "title": "Tutorials",
       "display": "children"
     },
-    "+++ DevTools": {
-      "title": "",
-      "type": "separator"
-    },
     "--- DevTools": {
       "title": "Developer tools",
       "type": "separator"
     },

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3ab1ffa and caa15df.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)

• pages/app-developers/_meta.json (1 hunks)
• pages/get-started/_meta.json (1 hunks)
• pages/stack/_meta.json (1 hunks)
• pages/stack/interop/_meta.json (1 hunks)

✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)

• pages/stack/interop/_meta.json

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (4)

• GitHub Check: Redirect rules - docs-optimism
• GitHub Check: Header rules - docs-optimism
• GitHub Check: Pages changed - docs-optimism
• GitHub Check: pr-workflow

🔇 Additional comments (3)

pages/stack/_meta.json (1)

27-27: LGTM! Terminology update aligns with PR objectives.

The change from "Interoperability" to "Superchain interoperability" maintains consistency with the documentation's focus on Superchain concepts.

pages/get-started/_meta.json (1)

8-8: LGTM! Consistent terminology update.

The change to "Superchain interoperability" maintains consistency across the documentation.

pages/app-developers/_meta.json (1)

8-8: LGTM! Terminology update maintains consistency.

The change to "Superchain interoperability" aligns with the documentation-wide update.