Skip to content

Conversation

@maennchen
Copy link
Member

Fixes #115

@maennchen maennchen self-assigned this Apr 26, 2025
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Apr 26, 2025

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 924c13144663be6edbfe8267722929e2390aacf1-PR-116

Details

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 91.477%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 3db4a678f1a7cd20abc334343239ebc3e25952f6: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 161
Relevant Lines: 176

💛 - Coveralls

@maennchen maennchen force-pushed the jm/dependency_review branch 5 times, most recently from 44b83b5 to 1dcd49f Compare April 26, 2025 10:15
@maennchen maennchen force-pushed the jm/dependency_review branch from 1dcd49f to 924c131 Compare April 26, 2025 10:18
@maennchen maennchen marked this pull request as ready for review April 26, 2025 10:23
@maennchen maennchen merged commit bcab9c0 into main Apr 26, 2025
15 checks passed
@maennchen maennchen deleted the jm/dependency_review branch April 26, 2025 10:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Using with dependency-review seems to not find cache

3 participants