-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 25.6k
Force flush in FullClusterRestartIT#testRecovery #46956
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Collaborator
|
Pinging @elastic/es-distributed |
ywelsch
approved these changes
Sep 22, 2019
Contributor
ywelsch
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Member
Author
|
Thanks @ywelsch. |
dnhatn
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 22, 2019
If peer recovery happens after indexing, and indexing flushes some shard at the end, then the explicit flush in the test will be a noop. Then replicas will have some uncommitted translog , which is transferred in peer recovery, although all of these operations are in the commit already. If that replica becomes primary (after we restarted the cluster), it will have translog to replay and the test will fail. Another issue in this test is that synced_flush is not a replication action, then the global checkpoint on replicas might be not up to date. We need to either wait for the global checkpoint to be synced or call a replication action to sync it. Closes #46712
dnhatn
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 23, 2019
If peer recovery happens after indexing, and indexing flushes some shard at the end, then the explicit flush in the test will be a noop. Then replicas will have some uncommitted translog , which is transferred in peer recovery, although all of these operations are in the commit already. If that replica becomes primary (after we restarted the cluster), it will have translog to replay and the test will fail. Another issue in this test is that synced_flush is not a replication action, then the global checkpoint on replicas might be not up to date. We need to either wait for the global checkpoint to be synced or call a replication action to sync it. Closes #46712
dnhatn
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 23, 2019
If peer recovery happens after indexing, and indexing flushes some shard at the end, then the explicit flush in the test will be a noop. Then replicas will have some uncommitted translog , which is transferred in peer recovery, although all of these operations are in the commit already. If that replica becomes primary (after we restarted the cluster), it will have translog to replay and the test will fail. Another issue in this test is that synced_flush is not a replication action, then the global checkpoint on replicas might be not up to date. We need to either wait for the global checkpoint to be synced or call a replication action to sync it. Closes #46712
dnhatn
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 24, 2019
If peer recovery happens after indexing, and indexing flushes some shard at the end, then the explicit flush in the test will be a noop. Then replicas will have some uncommitted translog , which is transferred in peer recovery, although all of these operations are in the commit already. If that replica becomes primary (after we restarted the cluster), it will have translog to replay and the test will fail. Another issue in this test is that synced_flush is not a replication action, then the global checkpoint on replicas might be not up to date. We need to either wait for the global checkpoint to be synced or call a replication action to sync it. Closes #46712
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
:Distributed Indexing/Recovery
Anything around constructing a new shard, either from a local or a remote source.
>test
Issues or PRs that are addressing/adding tests
v6.8.4
v7.3.3
v7.4.0
v7.5.0
v8.0.0-alpha1
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
If peer recovery happens after indexing, and indexing flushes some shard at the end, then the explicit flush in the test will be a noop. Then replicas will have some uncommitted translog , which is [transferred] in peer recovery, although all of these operations are in the commit already. If that replica becomes primary (after we restarted the cluster), it will have translog to replay and the test will fail. I can reproduce this failure in 0ced108.
Another issue in this test is that synced_flush is not a replication action, then the global checkpoint on replicas might be not up to date. We need to either wait for the global checkpoint to be synced or call a replication action to sync it.
Closes #46712