-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 185
[GTK][HiDpi] Code cleanup for removal of non-cairo scale path #1304
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Test Results 483 files - 3 483 suites - 3 10m 16s ⏱️ + 1m 39s For more details on these errors, see this check. Results for commit d55aaca. ± Comparison against base commit cec96e9. This pull request removes 19 tests.♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results. |
ba087cb to
1a73f3b
Compare
b48f0d1 to
52ca34f
Compare
|
@SyntevoAlex @akurtakov @merks @sravanlakkimsetti |
|
Sorry, I don't think I can find time to review. |
34598fc to
c8d4aa9
Compare
|
@akurtakov @iloveeclipse |
f73d855 to
f8c23a3
Compare
f8c23a3 to
5734db2
Compare
5734db2 to
21e5ae6
Compare
|
@akurtakov @iloveeclipse : Can you review this pr please? |
21e5ae6 to
8a7ad77
Compare
|
@deepika-u It's not even compiling as can be seen in the logs: |
bb37696 to
7aa653d
Compare
Thanks alot for reviewing this pr. I did the needed changes to TextLayout.java and those 2 errors are gone. Sorry it was a miss from my side. But now seeing error "The method org.eclipse.swt.graphics.Image.getBoundsInPixels() has been removed". For this if i change the version from 3.128.0.qualifier to 4.0.0, this error is gone. Should i be doing this change also? Do you also see this error with respect to Image.java and MANIFEST.MF files? |
|
@deepika-u You can not delete API. Even if it's deprecated it is not marked forRemoval and it has to stay 2 years after there is release with it marked that way. Bumping major version for that is also a no-go. |
7aa653d to
ff050b1
Compare
@akurtakov: Reverted the changes of Image.java, now when pr is applied i am not finding any errors. Can you please review now? Thanks alot in advance. |
Before asking me for review again please look at the build output . Automated build and tests are there so contributors see when things don't compile (previous case) or when tests fail(https://ci.eclipse.org/releng/job/eclipse.platform.swt/job/PR-1304/18/) like now. Please make sure that you have checked all fails and have a clean build before asking explicitly. |
Thanks for letting me know on another check(which i didnt knew), i shall check on them. |
ff050b1 to
e7f4d5d
Compare
e7f4d5d to
51da914
Compare
51da914 to
e4a4f35
Compare
e4a4f35 to
cf3d975
Compare
cf3d975 to
d55aaca
Compare
|
@deepika-u do you plan to finalize this work? Seeing those implementations simplified would still be nice. Maybe it would be possible to split this work up into multiple smaller commits/PRs, so that they can be reviewed more easily. |
Sure will cross check on it and update you again. |
|
Do you plan to fix that in next couple of weeks? I would like to see this in June release but it would better be in for M2 in case smth was mixed. |
|
Actually, I decided to split a bit and plan to land it in pieces. First one be #2030 |
|
Closing as this one went in "mostly" by other PRs. Please create smaller and thus easier to review PRs if you would like to clean up more. |
Fixes #1300