Extend SyntaxVisitorBase #11641
Merged
Extend SyntaxVisitorBase #11641
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Contributor
|
It looks good so far, maybe add a few tests to make sure it behaves as intended. |
Contributor
Author
|
How about now? |
dsyme
approved these changes
Nov 6, 2021
Contributor
|
Good work, thanks |
Merged
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Adding
VisitRecordDefn,VisitUnionDefnandVisitEnumDefnto be able to make use of it in a fix for #5974. I'll be honest though, not quite sure about these changes. (Will take care of surface area if this gets approved)