-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8k
Do not use for loops for package removal on debian-based systems #20271
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Using a loop was an intentional change; without a loop, this command may fail, and some packages still installed; see
Yeah, that's rather inconvenient, and II can see that being inconvenient. Not sure what a better solutions would be for that, without this step becoming overly complex. We could detect which packages are installed, but probably that would make it either an extra step, or "complex",
If your situation allows it, and needs to be run non-interactively, it's of course use your own variant 😅
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've just looked to these issues, and tested a few package removal combinations. Turns out, apt-get only fails if a package does not exist. That is, when there is no such package in the package repository. When a real package is not installed, apt continues normally:
According to docs itself, these guides are for debian 11 or higher, ubuntu 20.04 or higher, and their derivatives. All of the packages in the changed lines are in the repositories already. So, I think my change would not break something, or would it?
In #17405, the problem was related with nonexistent docker-engine package. Looks like that package is already removed from here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not sure when the
docker-enginepackage was removed from here but indeed,apt-getwill only skip and not error out if the package exists but was not installed. Given that we don't list any nonexistent packages here, I think we should be safe to remove the for-loop now. WDYT @thaJeztah?Besides, it's been a pretty long time since we shipped packages under those nonexistent (e.g.
docker-engine) names, no? We're only backwards compatible with oldstable, so this should be fine I think.