-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 28.9k
[SPARK-45967][BUILD] Upgrade jackson to 2.16.0 #43859
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
cc @pjfanning ~ Are there any issues that need special attention when upgrading to use Jackson 2.16.0? Thanks ~ |
| "was expecting (JSON String, Number, Array, Object or token 'null', 'true' or 'false')\n " + | ||
| "at [Source: (String)\"MAP<INT, cow>\"; line: 1, column: 4]" | ||
| "at [Source: REDACTED (`StreamReadFeature.INCLUDE_SOURCE_IN_LOCATION` disabled); " + | ||
| "line: 1, column: 4]" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
| "was expecting (JSON String, Number, Array, Object or token 'null', 'true' or 'false')\n" + | ||
| " at [Source: (String)\"x INT, a cow\"; line: 1, column: 2]" | ||
| " at [Source: REDACTED (`StreamReadFeature.INCLUDE_SOURCE_IN_LOCATION` disabled); " + | ||
| "line: 1, column: 2]" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
dito
|
@LuciferYang it appears you are hitting some issues with tests but other than that, I don't expect significant issues. The changes are less significant than in 2.15.x. The StreamReadConstraints in 2.15.0 could affect real world users - see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-42854 |
dongjoon-hyun
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This looks fine if CI passes.
dongjoon-hyun
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
+1, LGTM. Merged to master.
|
Thanks for your explain @pjfanning |
|
late LGTM |
The pr aims to upgrade FasterXML jackson from 2.15.2 to 2.16.0. New version that fix some bugs, release notes as follows: - 2.1.6.0 https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson/wiki/Jackson-Release-2.16, eg: [Databind](https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-databind) [apache#1770](FasterXML/jackson-databind#1770): Incorrect deserialization for BigDecimal numbers - 2.15.3 https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson/wiki/Jackson-Release-2.15.3, eg: [Databind](https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-databind) [apache#3968](FasterXML/jackson-databind#3968): Records with additional constructors failed to deserialize The last upgrade occurred 6 months ago, apache#41414 No. Pass GA. No. Closes apache#43859 from panbingkun/SPARK-45967. Authored-by: panbingkun <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <[email protected]>
) * [SPARK-45967][BUILD] Upgrade jackson to 2.16.0 ### What changes were proposed in this pull request? The pr aims to upgrade FasterXML jackson from 2.15.2 to 2.16.0. ### Why are the changes needed? New version that fix some bugs, release notes as follows: - 2.1.6.0 https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson/wiki/Jackson-Release-2.16, eg: [Databind](https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-databind) [apache#1770](FasterXML/jackson-databind#1770): Incorrect deserialization for BigDecimal numbers - 2.15.3 https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson/wiki/Jackson-Release-2.15.3, eg: [Databind](https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-databind) [apache#3968](FasterXML/jackson-databind#3968): Records with additional constructors failed to deserialize The last upgrade occurred 6 months ago, apache#41414 ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? No. ### How was this patch tested? Pass GA. ### Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling? No. Closes apache#43859 from panbingkun/SPARK-45967. Authored-by: panbingkun <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <[email protected]> (cherry picked from commit c17b092) * [SPARK-48826][BUILD] Upgrade `fasterxml.jackson` to 2.17.2 ### What changes were proposed in this pull request? This PR amis to upgrade `fasterxml.jackson` from 2.17.1 to 2.17.2. ### Why are the changes needed? There are some bug fixes about [Databind](https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-databind): [apache#4561](FasterXML/jackson-databind#4561): Issues using jackson-databind 2.17.1 with Reactor (wrt DeserializerCache and ReentrantLock) [apache#4575](FasterXML/jackson-databind#4575): StdDelegatingSerializer does not consider a Converter that may return null for a non-null input [apache#4577](FasterXML/jackson-databind#4577): Cannot deserialize value of type java.math.BigDecimal from String "3." (not a valid representation) [apache#4595](FasterXML/jackson-databind#4595): No way to explicitly disable wrapping in custom annotation processor [apache#4607](FasterXML/jackson-databind#4607): MismatchedInput: No Object Id found for an instance of X to assign to property 'id' [apache#4610](FasterXML/jackson-databind#4610): DeserializationFeature.FAIL_ON_UNRESOLVED_OBJECT_IDS does not work when used with Polymorphic type handling The full release note of 2.17.2: https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson/wiki/Jackson-Release-2.17.2 ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? No. ### How was this patch tested? Pass GA. ### Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling? No. Closes apache#47241 from wayneguow/upgrade_jackson. Authored-by: Wei Guo <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: yangjie01 <[email protected]> (cherry picked from commit 65daff5) * fix --------- Co-authored-by: panbingkun <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Wei Guo <[email protected]>

What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The pr aims to upgrade FasterXML jackson from 2.15.2 to 2.16.0.
Why are the changes needed?
New version that fix some bugs, release notes as follows:
Databind #1770: Incorrect deserialization for BigDecimal numbers
Databind #3968: Records with additional constructors failed to deserialize
The last upgrade occurred 6 months ago, #41414
Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No.
How was this patch tested?
Pass GA.
Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?
No.