Skip to content

Conversation

@felixcheung
Copy link
Member

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Doc change - see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-16324

How was this patch tested?

manual check

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Sep 2, 2016

Test build #64835 has finished for PR 14934 at commit 73c53a5.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

#' regexp_extract
#'
#' Extract a specific(idx) group identified by a java regex, from the specified string column.
#' Extract a specific \code{idx} group identified by a Java regex, from the specified string column.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Minor comment: It looks like idx was removed in the comment change in #14525 -- I'm not sure if it matters, but we could either keep it consistent with the Scala/Python doc or keep the idx if you think it helps.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I noticed that - I thought @param idx a group index isn't super descriptive on what it is

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Cool sounds good.

@shivaram
Copy link
Contributor

shivaram commented Sep 2, 2016

LGTM. Merging into master, branch-2.0

asfgit pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 2, 2016
…when match fails

## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Doc change - see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-16324

## How was this patch tested?

manual check

Author: Felix Cheung <[email protected]>

Closes #14934 from felixcheung/regexpextractdoc.

(cherry picked from commit 419eefd)
Signed-off-by: Shivaram Venkataraman <[email protected]>
@asfgit asfgit closed this in 419eefd Sep 2, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants