-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 332
Quickstart documentation contained an error around starting Polaris using docker compose #1660
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@ | ||
| host all all all md5 | ||
| hostnossl all all all md5 | ||
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ services: | |
| polaris.persistence.type: eclipse-link | ||
| polaris.persistence.eclipselink.configuration-file: /deployments/config/eclipselink/persistence.xml | ||
| volumes: | ||
| - ../assets/eclipselink/:/deployments/config/eclipselink | ||
|
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Let's revert the changes related to the
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. yes, I'm happy if we abandon this and work with what's started in #1610 ... do you think we should update the doco changes in that PR as well?
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. IT does look like the doco change I applied are also in 1610.. so this can be abandoned... thanks! |
||
| - ../eclipselink/:/deployments/config/eclipselink | ||
| command: | ||
| - "bootstrap" | ||
| - "--realm=POLARIS" | ||
|
|
||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I didn't find the need for this personally when running against the provided Postgres Docker image or against cloud providers. Are you using one of these deployment options?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am using what is defined.. I did not think I was using different containers... if I did not do this, the bootstrap failed because connections to the Postgres database were rejected (it was complaining about a missing pg_hba.conf, so I gave it one). Should the expected container have this?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
FYI, this is what's being used
edward.hillmann@U-RK427UANA9TF:~/sandbox/polaris-src/polaris$ docker container ls
CONTAINER ID IMAGE COMMAND CREATED STATUS PORTS NAMES
6da1eaec6c26 postgres:17.5 "docker-entrypoint.s…" 49 minutes ago Up 7 minutes (healthy) 0.0.0.0:5432->5432/tcp, [::]:5432->5432/tcp postgres-postgres-1