Skip to content

Conversation

stoty
Copy link
Contributor

@stoty stoty commented Sep 16, 2025

Description of PR

Backport of HADOOP-19680 to 3.4

How was this patch tested?

CI

For code changes:

  • Does the title or this PR starts with the corresponding JIRA issue id (e.g. 'HADOOP-17799. Your PR title ...')?
  • Object storage: have the integration tests been executed and the endpoint declared according to the connector-specific documentation?
  • If adding new dependencies to the code, are these dependencies licensed in a way that is compatible for inclusion under ASF 2.0?
  • If applicable, have you updated the LICENSE, LICENSE-binary, NOTICE-binary files?

same as the current thirdparty Guava version
@hadoop-yetus
Copy link

💔 -1 overall

Vote Subsystem Runtime Logfile Comment
+0 🆗 reexec 20m 37s Docker mode activated.
_ Prechecks _
+1 💚 dupname 0m 0s No case conflicting files found.
+0 🆗 codespell 0m 0s codespell was not available.
+0 🆗 detsecrets 0m 0s detect-secrets was not available.
+0 🆗 xmllint 0m 0s xmllint was not available.
+1 💚 @author 0m 0s The patch does not contain any @author tags.
-1 ❌ test4tests 0m 0s The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch.
_ branch-3.4 Compile Tests _
+1 💚 mvninstall 42m 47s branch-3.4 passed
+1 💚 compile 0m 21s branch-3.4 passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.27+6-post-Ubuntu-0ubuntu120.04
+1 💚 compile 0m 19s branch-3.4 passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_452-8u452-gaus1-0ubuntu120.04-b09
+1 💚 mvnsite 0m 23s branch-3.4 passed
+1 💚 javadoc 0m 25s branch-3.4 passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.27+6-post-Ubuntu-0ubuntu120.04
+1 💚 javadoc 0m 21s branch-3.4 passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_452-8u452-gaus1-0ubuntu120.04-b09
+1 💚 shadedclient 81m 52s branch has no errors when building and testing our client artifacts.
_ Patch Compile Tests _
+1 💚 mvninstall 0m 14s the patch passed
+1 💚 compile 0m 14s the patch passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.27+6-post-Ubuntu-0ubuntu120.04
+1 💚 javac 0m 14s the patch passed
+1 💚 compile 0m 13s the patch passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_452-8u452-gaus1-0ubuntu120.04-b09
+1 💚 javac 0m 13s the patch passed
+1 💚 blanks 0m 0s The patch has no blanks issues.
+1 💚 mvnsite 0m 15s the patch passed
+1 💚 javadoc 0m 14s the patch passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.27+6-post-Ubuntu-0ubuntu120.04
+1 💚 javadoc 0m 14s the patch passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_452-8u452-gaus1-0ubuntu120.04-b09
+1 💚 shadedclient 38m 34s patch has no errors when building and testing our client artifacts.
_ Other Tests _
+1 💚 unit 0m 18s hadoop-project in the patch passed.
+1 💚 asflicense 0m 36s The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
144m 35s
Subsystem Report/Notes
Docker ClientAPI=1.51 ServerAPI=1.51 base: https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-7977/1/artifact/out/Dockerfile
GITHUB PR #7977
Optional Tests dupname asflicense compile javac javadoc mvninstall mvnsite unit shadedclient codespell detsecrets xmllint
uname Linux fdfdb02d6db0 5.15.0-144-generic #157-Ubuntu SMP Mon Jun 16 07:33:10 UTC 2025 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Build tool maven
Personality dev-support/bin/hadoop.sh
git revision branch-3.4 / 054ffb6
Default Java Private Build-1.8.0_452-8u452-gaus1-0ubuntu120.04-b09
Multi-JDK versions /usr/lib/jvm/java-11-openjdk-amd64:Ubuntu-11.0.27+6-post-Ubuntu-0ubuntu120.04 /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64:Private Build-1.8.0_452-8u452-gaus1-0ubuntu120.04-b09
Test Results https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-7977/1/testReport/
Max. process+thread count 564 (vs. ulimit of 5500)
modules C: hadoop-project U: hadoop-project
Console output https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-7977/1/console
versions git=2.25.1 maven=3.6.3
Powered by Apache Yetus 0.14.0 https://yetus.apache.org

This message was automatically generated.

@slfan1989 slfan1989 merged commit 7bc1ac3 into apache:branch-3.4 Sep 19, 2025
0 of 2 checks passed
@slfan1989
Copy link
Contributor

@stoty Sorry for the late reply, thanks for the contribution!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants