Skip to content

Conversation

@senthh
Copy link

@senthh senthh commented Sep 2, 2024

What changes were proposed in this pull request? Upgrade vis timeline to 7.7.2

Have to add xss option with whitelisting to make the timeline work after the xss protection was added in vis-timeline. (Refer to visjs/vis-timeline#1010)

Why are the changes needed?

To remediate CVE-2020-28487
GHSA-9mrv-456v-pf22

Does this PR introduce any user-facing change? No

How was this patch tested?

Manually by running spark-shell and checking History Server UI. Timeline rendered successfully and no change in style. Even after following operation:
(1 to 1000).foreach(_ => sc.parallelize(1 to 10).collect) UI loaded in 3 seconds faster than it loaded with 4.21.

Closes apache#41613 from shrprasa/upgrade_vis.

Authored-by: Shrikant Prasad [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen [email protected]

(cherry picked from commit a8ea35f)

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Why are the changes needed?

Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?

How was this patch tested?

…020-28487

### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Upgrade vis timeline to 7.7.2
Have to add xss option with whitelisting to make the timeline work after the xss protection was added in vis-timeline.
(Refer to visjs/vis-timeline#1010)

### Why are the changes needed?
To remediate CVE-2020-28487
GHSA-9mrv-456v-pf22

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No

### How was this patch tested?
Manually by running spark-shell and checking History Server UI.
Timeline rendered successfully and no change in style.
Even after following operation:
(1 to 1000).foreach(_ => sc.parallelize(1 to 10).collect)
UI loaded in 3 seconds faster than it loaded with 4.21.

Closes apache#41613 from shrprasa/upgrade_vis.

Authored-by: Shrikant Prasad <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <[email protected]>

(cherry picked from commit a8ea35f)
@senthh senthh self-assigned this Sep 2, 2024
@prabhjyotsingh prabhjyotsingh merged commit ecc7b4b into hf/ODP-3.2.3.2-201 Sep 3, 2024
@senthh senthh deleted the ODP-2169 branch September 4, 2024 07:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants