Skip to content

Conversation

pp-mo
Copy link
Member

@pp-mo pp-mo commented Nov 18, 2019

Saving ancillary variables, with some testcases based on CDL comparisons.

There is some unfinished business here where the tests might be improved,
if and when they can use other aspects of ancillary support :
UPDATE:
FIxed that.
Nearly good to go?

@pp-mo pp-mo added this to the v3.0.0 milestone Nov 18, 2019
@pp-mo pp-mo self-assigned this Nov 18, 2019
@pp-mo pp-mo mentioned this pull request Nov 18, 2019
@pp-mo pp-mo force-pushed the ancil_save branch 2 times, most recently from c0c7158 to c67578f Compare November 19, 2019 18:11
@pp-mo
Copy link
Member Author

pp-mo commented Nov 20, 2019

Hi @stephenworsley
Now rebased, should be GTG ! 🙏

Copy link
Contributor

@stephenworsley stephenworsley left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just a couple minor things I've noticed on my first pass through the code.

@stephenworsley stephenworsley self-assigned this Nov 26, 2019
@abooton abooton changed the title Netcdf saving of ancillary variables P.3473: Netcdf saving of ancillary variables Nov 26, 2019
@abooton abooton changed the title P.3473: Netcdf saving of ancillary variables PI3473: Netcdf saving of ancillary variables Nov 26, 2019
@abooton abooton changed the title PI3473: Netcdf saving of ancillary variables PI-3473: Netcdf saving of ancillary variables Nov 26, 2019
@pp-mo
Copy link
Member Author

pp-mo commented Nov 26, 2019

it probably ought to fail then, I think, complaining that the ancillary to be added is identical to one already there.

Rebased, and it did fail as predicted 👍
Now fixed.

Copy link
Contributor

@stephenworsley stephenworsley left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me.

@stephenworsley stephenworsley merged commit ba7756f into SciTools:master Nov 27, 2019
@pp-mo pp-mo deleted the ancil_save branch March 18, 2022 15:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants