-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.6k
Fix killed conda 1.10 CI workflow #10077
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
seems the fix is working as expected :] |
|
Build Error! No Linked Issue found. Please link an issue or mention it in the body using #<issue_id> |
|
Build Error! No Linked Issue found. Please link an issue or mention it in the body using #<issue_id> |
tchaton
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM !
Co-authored-by: Carlos Mocholí <[email protected]>
|
Build Error! No Linked Issue found. Please link an issue or mention it in the body using #<issue_id> |
|
Build Error! No Linked Issue found. Please link an issue or mention it in the body using #<issue_id> |
akihironitta
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Seems like it's still failing https://github.com/PyTorchLightning/pytorch-lightning/runs/3974228641?check_suite_focus=true#step:6:2364
|
Yes, it worked before. |
.github/workflows/ci_test-conda.yml
Outdated
| container: pytorchlightning/pytorch_lightning:base-conda-py${{ matrix.python-version }}-torch${{ matrix.pytorch-version }} | ||
| container: | ||
| image: pytorchlightning/pytorch_lightning:base-conda-py${{ matrix.python-version }}-torch${{ matrix.pytorch-version }} | ||
| options: --shm-size=1G |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I remember it worked in Bolts a while back ago by setting --ipc=host (which is another way of increase shm as stated in pytorch's readme) instead of setting specific size. Shall we try this?
| options: --shm-size=1G | |
| options: --ipc=host |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just applied the change here. Let's see if it works...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok, it didn't work either...
tests/loggers/test_all.py::test_logger_created_on_rank_zero_only[CSVLogger] PASSED [ 31%]
/__w/_temp/bdfbf602-7035-441f-aa67-5db678b2f0ea.sh: line 2: 93 Killed coverage run --source pytorch_lightning -m pytest pytorch_lightning tests -v --durations=50 --junitxml=junit/test-results-Linux-torch1.10.xml
tests/loggers/test_all.py::test_logger_created_on_rank_zero_only[MLFlowLogger]
Error: Process completed with exit code 137.
|
Build Error! No Linked Issue found. Please link an issue or mention it in the body using #<issue_id> |
1 similar comment
|
Build Error! No Linked Issue found. Please link an issue or mention it in the body using #<issue_id> |
|
I am seeing the same issue in #10113 and #10112. in the second one it is also timing out for do we have an issue tracking this? |
|
@daniellepintz I don't think we do. |
What does this PR do?
We have conda 1.10 workflow crashing randomly: https://github.com/PyTorchLightning/pytorch-lightning/runs/3971666315?check_suite_focus=true
This is the error:
tests/helpers/test_models.py::test_models[None-ParityModuleRNN] PASSED [ 31%] /__w/_temp/2a0a0b32-902c-4e18-bf17-5c09efcb74cf.sh: line 2: 90 Killed coverage run --source pytorch_lightning -m pytest pytorch_lightning tests -v --durations=50 --junitxml=junit/test-results-Linux-torch1.10.xml tests/helpers/test_models.py::test_models[None-ParityModuleMNIST] Error: Process completed with exit code 137.RIP
Before submitting
PR review
Anyone in the community is free to review the PR once the tests have passed.
Before you start reviewing make sure you have read Review guidelines. In short, see the following bullet-list:
Did you have fun?
I made sure I had fun coding 🙃