Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on May 4, 2019. It is now read-only.

Conversation

simonster
Copy link
Member

This fixes #92, and also speeds up sorting generally, since we avoid type instability. It also includes a change that places NAs at the end instead of the beginning of a sorted array, consistent with the way
Base sorts NaN values.

This fixes #92, and also speeds up sorting generally, since we avoid
type instability. It also includes a change that places NAs at the end
instead of the beginning of a sorted array, consistent with the way
Base sorts NaN values.
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.13%) when pulling 9ca7e13 on sjk/sort into aca6c87 on master.

simonster added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 10, 2014
Efficient sorting of DataArrays
@simonster simonster merged commit 1359a53 into master Jul 10, 2014
@simonster simonster deleted the sjk/sort branch July 10, 2014 12:58
@garborg
Copy link
Member

garborg commented Jul 10, 2014

The NA change mentioned here breaks these pda-da sorting comparisons in the DataFrames tests. What do you think about doing the same for pooled data arrays?

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Some methods from the standard library don't fulfil their contract

3 participants