- 
                Notifications
    You must be signed in to change notification settings 
- Fork 45
Fix indexing for 0D views #197
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
| Codecov Report
 @@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #197      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   98.93%   98.23%   -0.71%     
==========================================
  Files           5        5              
  Lines         283      284       +1     
==========================================
- Hits          280      279       -1     
- Misses          3        5       +2     
 Continue to review full report at Codecov. 
 | 
| Can we just put this fix in Base? Changing  | 
| Yes the fix should go to  | 
| Crossref : julia#39404 | 
| Sounds good. Let's wait for that to merge and then add this only on older Julia versions. The risk of method ambiguities seems low in this case, but if we don't have to... | 
| Is it weird that codecov flags  | 
| Indeed, I don't really understand how this works. Since imposing the version bound seems to have upset codecov, is it that the coverage is being reported by the test on nightly? | 
| My best guess is the first coverage upload in a short period, which happens to be the Julia latest(1 minute) due to a large number of invalidation fixes. If we want it to be predictable, then we could add a version check in our CI settings: OffsetArrays.jl/.github/workflows/UnitTest.yml Lines 61 to 63 in 97cef1a 
 | 
| Thanks again for fixing this! | 
This fixes #128 going by the discussion in julia#37274 and in the spirit of #196.
Now