Skip to content

Conversation

@rhatgadkar-goog
Copy link
Collaborator

#406 added support for static connection info. But
5d9c473 accidentally deleted actually using the static connection info to create the cache. So re-adding that change in this PR.

#406
added support for static connection info. But
5d9c473
accidentally deleted actually using the static connection info to create
the cache. So re-adding that change in this PR.
@rhatgadkar-goog rhatgadkar-goog requested a review from a team as a code owner July 19, 2025 00:06
@rhatgadkar-goog rhatgadkar-goog requested a review from enocom July 19, 2025 00:08
@enocom
Copy link
Member

enocom commented Jul 21, 2025

Should we put a test around this code so something fails if we make a similar mistake?

@rhatgadkar-goog
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Should we put a test around this code so something fails if we make a similar mistake?

done

@rhatgadkar-goog rhatgadkar-goog merged commit bcc68cd into main Jul 21, 2025
15 checks passed
@rhatgadkar-goog rhatgadkar-goog deleted the fix-using-static-conninfo branch July 21, 2025 17:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants