-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8.2k
Bluetooth: Host: Bitwise-or CCC values #44136
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
alwa-nordic
wants to merge
3
commits into
zephyrproject-rtos:main
from
alwa-nordic:bitwise-or-ccc-value
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -1890,8 +1890,16 @@ static void gatt_ccc_changed(const struct bt_gatt_attr *attr, | |
| uint16_t value = 0x0000; | ||
|
|
||
| for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(ccc->cfg); i++) { | ||
| if (ccc->cfg[i].value > value) { | ||
| value = ccc->cfg[i].value; | ||
| /* `ccc->value` shall be a summary of connected peers' CCC values, but | ||
| * `ccc->cfg` can contain entries for bonded but not connected peers. | ||
| */ | ||
| struct bt_conn *conn = bt_conn_lookup_addr_le(ccc->cfg[i].id, &ccc->cfg[i].peer); | ||
|
|
||
| if (conn) { | ||
| value |= ccc->cfg[i].value; | ||
|
|
||
| bt_conn_unref(conn); | ||
| conn = NULL; | ||
|
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. This setting to NULL doesn't really give you anything, as the function returns immediately thereafter and the variable goes out of scope |
||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would like to change this to trigger on any change to the
cfgfield. RFCThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
On the other hand, it would be awkward because only
valueis passed as a parameter here.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I see your point.
Technically a device keeps a CCCD for each client which is of course abstracted away by the API, so it appears as just a single value.
It does sound a bit odd to call the callback every time there is a change, since the value may not actually change here, and the application would thus not really be able to use that information for anything.
I think in the case where an application needs/wants more specific knowledge or handling of CCCD writes, it would just just the
BT_GATT_CCC_MANAGEDto do that.