missing async uart.h system calls

[andrewboie]

Describe the bug
The set of system calls for our serial API subsystem is incomplete. We are missing system calls for the following APIs, all of which are related to CONFIG_UART_ASYNC_API:

uart_tx()
uart_tx_abort()
uart_rx_enable()
uart_rx_disable()

uart_callback_set() installs a callback handler and shouldn't have a system call. uart_tx_buf_rsp() is only intended to be invoked from callbacks. The rest we should add unless we can specify a reason not to.

Impact
User mode threads can't use these APIs.

[andrewboie]

Original PR discussion for async API is here:

#10820

There's a lot of discussion in here, but from skimming over all of it appears that the async UART APIs are intended for supervisor mode only, and these APIs are intended to be used by other drivers that are built on top of the UART. And that application code wouldn't use these APIs. @nordic-krch @pfalcon @Mierunski @carlescufi do I have that right?

[carlescufi]

I don't think that's accurate

There's a lot of discussion in here, but from skimming over all of it appears that the async UART APIs are intended for supervisor mode only, and these APIs are intended to be used by other drivers that are built on top of the UART. And that application code wouldn't use these APIs. @nordic-krch @pfalcon @Mierunski @carlescufi do I have that right?

I am really not sure that is the case. I think those are actually also intended for application use. @nordic-krch and @Mierunski can you please confirm?

[nordic-krch]

We had that discussion already.
See #10820 (comment) and #10820 (comment)

It's not intended to be used in userspace. Tty api is more suitable.

[andrewboie]

We had that discussion already.
See #10820 (comment) and #10820 (comment)

Yeah, this discussion isn't very clear. I saw these comments.

We have lots of driver subsystems which have both system calls and callback registration. We don't allow callback registration from user mode, so the callback APIs are left supervisor only. But the rest of the APIs are exposed as system calls. The programming model is to set up callbacks at application init, before dropping privileges to user mode.

What's special about this set of async APIs that we cannot create system calls for everything except uart_callback_set()? What am I missing here?

It's not intended to be used in userspace. Tty api is more suitable.

That wasn't my question -- I was asking if this is an application API or only intended for use by drivers.

[Mierunski]

From #10820 by @pfalcon

To give additional input to your analysis, consider that Zephyr supports userspace/kernel split. You very well know that because you have __syscall in your patch. Something people keep missing is that callbacks from kernel to userspace is no-go for this mode.
So, even at the very start of your analysis you would have following conjecture:
This PR proposes API which is suitable only for kernel mode.

This was main argument for removing system calls from API (they were there at start of PR). There wasn't much interest in keeping system calls from other participants.
For me it wouldn't hurt to add system calls. If it makes sense to have API with callbacks and system calls. Only uart_rx_buf_rsp() is a function intended to be called from callback context.

That wasn't my question -- I was asking if this is an application API or only intended for use by drivers.

In my opinion this could also be application API, as (for me) it is easier to use than interrupt driven API.