This repository was archived by the owner on Mar 25, 2021. It is now read-only.
Use specialized method to select an <option> in test #76
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
guergana
suggested changes
Nov 24, 2020
micgro42
force-pushed
the
fixSelectTest
branch
from
387fb3d to
09b2192
Compare
The setSelected method is documented in: https://vue-test-utils.vuejs.org/api/wrapper/#setselected
micgro42
force-pushed
the
fixSelectTest
branch
from
09b2192 to
bf6a39b
Compare
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The setSelected() method was added in vuejs/vue-test-utils#557, but apparently never documented. It seems stable and intended for end-user use nonetheless, so it is probably just an oversight documentation wise.ThesetSelected()is actually documented in https://vue-test-utils.vuejs.org/api/wrapper/#setselected -- no idea why I didn't find it when I first looked.This PR should make the test last touched in #72 more robust