Skip to content

Conversation

Mattwmaster58
Copy link
Contributor

@Mattwmaster58 Mattwmaster58 commented May 8, 2020

Added feature: allowing comparing of PIL.Image instances through contrib.PIL.pixelmatch (fixes #36)

  • added docs
    • including example
  • added tests using the same data as other tests

Much cleaner than cramming it all into one function 😉

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 8, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #42 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##            master       #42   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files            1         1           
  Lines           19        19           
=========================================
  Hits            19        19           

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update affdc47...affdc47. Read the comment docs.

@Mattwmaster58 Mattwmaster58 requested a review from whtsky May 9, 2020 17:36
@whtsky whtsky merged commit 1967796 into whtsky:master May 10, 2020
@whtsky
Copy link
Owner

whtsky commented May 10, 2020

Merged, thanks!

@Mattwmaster58
Copy link
Contributor Author

No rush on this, but any estimate on a PyPi release @whtsky ?

@whtsky
Copy link
Owner

whtsky commented May 11, 2020 via email

@whtsky
Copy link
Owner

whtsky commented May 11, 2020

https://pypi.org/project/pixelmatch/0.2.1/

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

support for pixelmatching directly on PIL.Image objects
2 participants