🚀 release: v1.0.0-beta.2 #4
Conversation
…ployment Co-authored-by: warengonzaga <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <[email protected]>
…b5a5-0c57e7f0b894 Add Docker support for containerized deployment
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@warengonzaga has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 4 minutes and 49 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughSir, a comprehensive suite of enhancements has been introduced for Docker support and deployment. This includes a multi-stage Dockerfile, a detailed Changes
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
.dockerignore (1)
53-82: Documentation & caches
As you command, sir: docs, cache artefacts, and test folders are excluded to avoid unnecessary bloat. Consider also ignoring.npmrcif it contains private registry credentials.Dockerfile (1)
56-57: Healthcheck covers readiness
Sir, the HTTP GET to/healthproperly flags container health. ConsiderCMD-SHELLif you need richer check semantics in the future.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
.dockerignore(1 hunks)Dockerfile(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Checkov (3.2.334)
Dockerfile
[HIGH] 34-36: Ensure that certificate validation isn't disabled for npm or yarn by setting the option strict-ssl to false
(CKV2_DOCKER_13)
🔇 Additional comments (7)
.dockerignore (3)
1-10: Lean build context: dependencies & build outputs ignored
Certainly, sir: excludingnode_modules/, debug logs, and build artifacts (dist/,build/) will dramatically shrink the Docker build context.
11-19: Environment file strategy
Sir, note that.env.*excludes all variants, including.env.production. Ensure you inject runtime secrets via mounts or environment variables at deploy time.
20-52: IDE, OS artifacts, logs & temp directories
Certainly, sir: ignoring IDE/editor files, OS metadata, logs, runtime data, coverage, and temp folders keeps your context clean and performant.Dockerfile (4)
4-20: Builder stage is efficient
Certainly, sir: the multi-stage build’s first stage isolates devDependencies and compiles only source files, which minimizes the final image size.
35-36: Confirm--ignore-scriptsusage
As you command, sir: skipping scripts may break essential lifecycle hooks for some production packages. Verify that no postinstall or prepare scripts are required in production.
45-50: Enforcing least privilege
Certainly, sir: creating a non-rootnodejsuser and adjusting ownership is a robust security measure.
60-60: Correct exec form for start command
Certainly, sir: using the JSON-array form ensures the command runs without an extra shell layer.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
.env.example (2)
2-4: Organize keys alphabetically for readability
Of course, Sir – reorderingREDIS_URLaboveTARGET_PLATFORMaligns with lint rules and upholds clarity.Diff:
PORT=3000 -TARGET_PLATFORM=telegram -REDIS_URL=redis://localhost:6379 +REDIS_URL=redis://localhost:6379 +TARGET_PLATFORM=telegram
5-5: Ensure trailing newline at EOF
A blank line at file end refines POSIX compliance and silences the linter.Add a newline after:
UNTHREAD_WEBHOOK_SECRET=your_production_webhook_secret_here.env.docker.example (1)
3-4: Harmonize key ordering in Docker example
Sir, kindly positionREDIS_URLbeforeTARGET_PLATFORMfor consistency with.env.example.Diff:
PORT=3000 -TARGET_PLATFORM=telegram -REDIS_URL=redis://host.docker.internal:6379 +REDIS_URL=redis://host.docker.internal:6379 +TARGET_PLATFORM=telegram
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
.env.docker.example(1 hunks).env.example(1 hunks).gitignore(1 hunks)README.md(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- .gitignore
- README.md
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 dotenv-linter (3.3.0)
.env.docker.example
[warning] 4-4: [UnorderedKey] The REDIS_URL key should go before the TARGET_PLATFORM key
.env.example
[warning] 4-4: [UnorderedKey] The REDIS_URL key should go before the TARGET_PLATFORM key
[warning] 5-5: [EndingBlankLine] No blank line at the end of the file
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
.env.docker.example (2)
1-5: Environment template ready for Docker builds
Certainly, sir. All required variables are defined for container execution. ReplaceUNTHREAD_WEBHOOK_SECRETwith a secure value and note thathost.docker.internalis specific to Docker Desktop environments.
5-5: Add trailing newline
A blank line at EOF will satisfy dotenv-linter’s [EndingBlankLine] rule, sir..env.example (2)
1-1: NODE_ENV set to production
Understood, sir..env.examplenow reflects production defaults. If retaining this file for development, consider renaming to avoid environment confusion.
5-5: Add trailing newline
Please include a blank line at EOF to comply with dotenv-linter, sir.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
.env.docker.example(1 hunks).env.example(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 dotenv-linter (3.3.0)
.env.docker.example
[warning] 5-5: [EndingBlankLine] No blank line at the end of the file
.env.example
[warning] 5-5: [EndingBlankLine] No blank line at the end of the file
🔇 Additional comments (2)
.env.example (2)
4-4: TARGET_PLATFORM position updated
Order shifts are harmless. Confirm that documentation mirrors this new sequence, sir.
5-5: Production webhook secret placeholder
The updated placeholder clarifies production usage. Ensure docs specify where to obtain the actualUNTHREAD_WEBHOOK_SECRET, sir.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.env.example (1)
1-7: Add trailing newline for dotenv-linter compliance, Sir.
A blank line at EOF prevents the linter warning and ensures POSIX compatibility.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
.env.example(1 hunks).gitignore(1 hunks)README.md(1 hunks)docker-compose.yml(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- docker-compose.yml
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- README.md
- .gitignore
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 dotenv-linter (3.3.0)
.env.example
[warning] 7-7: [EndingBlankLine] No blank line at the end of the file
🔇 Additional comments (3)
.env.example (3)
3-4: Clear differentiation for REDIS_URL comments, Sir.
These new comments elegantly guide developers on local vs Docker Compose usage without ambiguity.
6-6: TARGET_PLATFORM repositioning is sensible, Sir.
MovingTARGET_PLATFORMbelow the Redis settings groups related variables logically.
7-7: Verify webhook secret placeholder consistency, Sir.
Please confirm thatUNTHREAD_WEBHOOK_SECRET=your_webhook_secret_herealigns with the variable names indocker-compose.ymland the updated README.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
.github/workflows/validate.yml (1)
11-11: Whitespace cleanup, sir. I detect trailing spaces on the listed lines; removing them will eliminate YAML lint errors and maintain a clean workflow file.Also applies to: 15-15, 21-21, 24-24, 27-27, 30-30
.github/workflows/build.yml (1)
15-15: Whitespace cleanup, sir. Multiple lines end with trailing spaces, which trigger YAML lint warnings. Please trim them to keep the workflow tidy.Also applies to: 19-19, 22-22, 28-28, 35-35, 41-41, 62-62
.github/workflows/release.yml (1)
16-16: Whitespace cleanup, sir. I observe trailing spaces on several lines, leading to YAML lint errors. Kindly remove these extraneous spaces to ensure consistency.Also applies to: 20-20, 27-27, 33-33, 40-40, 50-50, 58-58, 65-65, 72-72, 75-75, 95-95, 102-102, 108-108
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
.github/workflows/build.yml(1 hunks).github/workflows/release.yml(1 hunks).github/workflows/validate.yml(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 actionlint (1.7.7)
.github/workflows/release.yml
78-78: this step is for running shell command since it contains at least one of "run", "shell" keys, but also contains "uses" key which is used for running action
(syntax-check)
79-79: this step is for running shell command since it contains at least one of "run", "shell" keys, but also contains "with" key which is used for running action
(syntax-check)
🪛 YAMLlint (1.37.1)
.github/workflows/release.yml
[error] 16-16: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 20-20: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 27-27: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 33-33: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 40-40: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 50-50: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 58-58: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 65-65: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 72-72: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 75-75: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 95-95: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 102-102: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 108-108: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
.github/workflows/build.yml
[error] 15-15: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 19-19: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 22-22: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 28-28: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 35-35: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 41-41: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 62-62: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
.github/workflows/validate.yml
[error] 11-11: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 15-15: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 21-21: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 24-24: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 27-27: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 30-30: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/workflows/release.yml (1)
44-49: Verify semantic version extraction, sir. Thecut -d. -ftechnique may mis-handle prerelease identifiers (e.g.,beta). Please confirm that major, minor, and patch values are correctly extracted for versions like1.0.0-beta.2.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull Request Overview
This PR bumps the package to version 1.0.0-beta.2, adds containerization support with Docker and Docker Compose, introduces CI/CD workflows for validation, build, and release, and updates documentation to cover the new setup.
- Bumped version in package.json
- Added Dockerfile and docker-compose.yml for containerized deployment
- Introduced GitHub Actions workflows: validate, build (dev), and release (prod)
- Updated README and
.env.examplefor Docker usage
Reviewed Changes
Copilot reviewed 9 out of 10 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.
Show a summary per file
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| package.json | Bump version to 1.0.0-beta.2 |
| docker-compose.yml | Define Redis and webhook-server services with health checks |
| Dockerfile | Multi-stage build with builder and production stages |
| README.md | Add Docker setup instructions |
| .github/workflows/validate.yml | Add validate job: checkout, install, type check, build, Docker test |
| .github/workflows/build.yml | Add dev build job: build and push development images |
| .github/workflows/release.yml | Add release job: extract version, build and push images, scan |
| .env.example | Update example env vars with comments for Docker vs local |
| .dockerignore | Add optimized ignore rules for Docker context |
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (4)
.github/workflows/release.yml:48
- Splitting the version string by
.will mis-handle pre-release versions like1.0.0-beta.2. Consider using a semver-aware tool or Node script (e.g.,node -p "require('semver').parse(require('./package.json').version).patch") to extract major, minor, and patch correctly.
echo "patch=$(echo $VERSION | cut -d. -f1-3)" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT
.github/workflows/validate.yml:26
- Add a linting step (e.g.,
run: yarn lint) before or after type checking to catch style and formatting issues early in the CI pipeline.
run: yarn type-check
README.md:76
- Extend the Docker setup docs to remind users to populate
TARGET_PLATFORMandUNTHREAD_WEBHOOK_SECRETin their.envafter copying the template, ensuring all required variables are documented.
- `.env.example` - Template (Redis URL gets overridden automatically for Docker)
Dockerfile:41
- [nitpick] Including
.env.examplein the production image isn’t necessary and may expose configuration templates. Consider removing this COPY to slim down the final image.
COPY .env.example ./
Summary by CodeRabbit
.dockerignorefor optimized Docker builds..gitignoreto exclude additional environment file variants..env.examplewith improved comments and example values.