Is it standards track? #1181
Description
Feature request from web-platform-dx/web-features#484.
I would like to answer the question "is it standards track" for every feature in web-features, and @tidoust suggested we might be able to improve the status field here in browser-specs to handle that.
The definition we had in the Interop 2024 proposal template was a good start:
Specification for the feature. The feature must defined by a standards-track specification from one of the following organizations:
- IETF (Standard Track)
- Khronos Group
- TC39 (Stage 2+)
- W3C (Recommendation Track)
- WHATWG
In web-platform-tests/interop#589 we also concluded that for WebAssembly, Phase 3+ was a reasonable bar.
Zooming out, I think we want to pick a point in the process for each standards organization that crosses the bar of multi-vendor interest. Most processes aren't defined in those terms, but in practice there is roughly such a point.