Add no-caller and no-eval mergers #227
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
JoshuaKGoldberg
approved these changes
Oct 7, 2019
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is excellent! +1 to allowIndirect only being enabled if both rules had it. Thanks @jeremyyap!
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
PR Checklist
status: accepting prsOverview
no-calleris quite straightforward as it has no options.no-evalI only setallowIndirect: trueif both original and new options have it set to true, because otherwise at least one of the original TSLint rules would have flagged indirectevalcalls out.ESLint Docs
no-callerno-eval