fix inconsistency in doc: send_keys

[subbyte]

There is a minor doc inconsistency when I read the send_keys() method of pane. This fixes it.

Summary by Sourcery

Documentation:

• Corrects the documented default value of the literal parameter in the send_keys() method of the pane module from True to False.

[sourcery-ai]

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

This pull request fixes an inconsistency in the documentation for the send_keys method in the pane.py file. Specifically, it corrects the default value of the literal parameter from True to False.

No diagrams generated as the changes look simple and do not need a visual representation.

File-Level Changes

Change	Details	Files
Corrected the default value of the literal parameter in the send_keys method documentation.	Changed the default value of the literal parameter from True to False in the documentation.	src/libtmux/pane.py

---

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

• Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
• Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
• Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
  issue from a review comment by replying to it. You can also reply to a
  review comment with @sourcery-ai issue to create an issue from it.
• Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
  request title to generate a title at any time. You can also comment
  @sourcery-ai title on the pull request to (re-)generate the title at any time.
• Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
  the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time exactly where you
  want it. You can also comment @sourcery-ai summary on the pull request to
  (re-)generate the summary at any time.
• Generate reviewer's guide: Comment @sourcery-ai guide on the pull
  request to (re-)generate the reviewer's guide at any time.
• Resolve all Sourcery comments: Comment @sourcery-ai resolve on the
  pull request to resolve all Sourcery comments. Useful if you've already
  addressed all the comments and don't want to see them anymore.
• Dismiss all Sourcery reviews: Comment @sourcery-ai dismiss on the pull
  request to dismiss all existing Sourcery reviews. Especially useful if you
  want to start fresh with a new review - don't forget to comment
  @sourcery-ai review to trigger a new review!
• Generate a plan of action for an issue: Comment @sourcery-ai plan on
  an issue to generate a plan of action for it.

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

• Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
  summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
• Change the review language.
• Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
• Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

• Contact our support team for questions or feedback.
• Visit our documentation for detailed guides and information.
• Keep in touch with the Sourcery team by following us on X/Twitter, LinkedIn or GitHub.

[CLAassistant]

All committers have signed the CLA.

[sourcery-ai]

Hey @subbyte - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:

Overall Comments:

• It's great you caught this inconsistency and fixed it!

Here's what I looked at during the review

• 🟢 General issues: all looks good
• 🟢 Security: all looks good
• 🟢 Testing: all looks good
• 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
• 🟢 Documentation: all looks good

---

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨

• X
• Mastodon
• LinkedIn
• Facebook

_{Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.}

[tony]

Good catch, thank you!

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 81.48%. Comparing base (1611518) to head (3159e76).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #593   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   81.48%   81.48%           
=======================================
  Files          37       37           
  Lines        2430     2430           
  Branches      368      368           
=======================================
  Hits         1980     1980           
  Misses        308      308           
  Partials      142      142           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.