-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
Java 11 compatibility #43
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
0ab3f6a
to
6ee89b3
Compare
6ee89b3
to
54198d3
Compare
@mgierlings can you take a look at this/these PR's? |
especially the changed test in this PR does need review b/c i needed to change the source/expected (java 11 formats the xml differently than java 8). I could use some help here on how to configure the formatter properly. |
From what I can tell, the issue with the incorrect formatting is now resolved with the latest commits. Could you please verify that? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good to me, just please clarify my question
Btw, I am getting the following error when using OpenJDK 11
Apparently, this will should be fixed with newer versions, so no problem, see google/guice#1133 |
I'm not seeing the illegal reflected access you mentioned. Could you tell me, when this happened? Guice is not a direct dependency of ModifiableVariable, nor does it seem to be a transitive dependency (according to |
Yes, this seems to be only because of my mvn version:
|
(otherwise, if java home is not set, then we get an exception) This way, we use the standard system version if not defined by java home
No description provided.