Skip to content

Conversation

@theturtle32
Copy link
Owner

Summary

Updates TEST_SUITE_MODERNIZATION_PLAN.md to reflect the completion of Phase 5.1 Browser Compatibility testing.

Updates:

  • ✅ Marked Phase 5.1 as "Infrastructure Complete" with 12 tests
  • ✅ Updated overall project progress from 85% to 88%
  • ✅ Updated test counts: 1,133 → 1,145 total tests
  • ✅ Added browser test details and npm scripts documentation
  • ✅ Updated Phase 5 completion from 50% to 70%

Browser Testing Implementation:

  • 12 Playwright browser tests passing
  • Express-based WebSocket test server
  • Interactive HTML test page
  • Support for Chromium, Firefox, and WebKit

Test plan

This is a documentation-only change. No code changes.

  • ✅ All 628 unit/integration tests still passing
  • ✅ All 12 browser tests still passing
  • ✅ No functional changes

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Phase 5.1 Browser Compatibility marked as complete with:
- 12 Playwright browser tests implemented
- Express-based WebSocket test server
- Interactive HTML test page
- Support for Chromium, Firefox, WebKit

Overall progress: 85% → 88%
Total tests: 1,133 → 1,145

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <[email protected]>
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello @theturtle32, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request updates the TEST_SUITE_MODERNIZATION_PLAN.md document to reflect the successful completion of Phase 5.1 Browser Compatibility testing. It integrates details about the new Playwright-based browser test suite, an Express-based WebSocket test server, and an interactive HTML test page, while also updating overall project progress, test counts, and phase completion percentages. This is a documentation-only change, signifying a significant milestone in the test suite modernization.

Highlights

  • Project Progress Update: The overall project progress has been updated from 85% to 88% complete, reflecting recent advancements.
  • Browser Compatibility Testing Completed: Phase 5.1 Browser Compatibility is now marked as 'Infrastructure Complete', with 12 new Playwright-based browser tests successfully implemented.
  • Increased Test Count: The total number of tests has increased from 1,133 to 1,145, incorporating the newly added browser tests.
  • Phase 5 E2E Testing Advancement: Phase 5 End-to-End Testing completion has been updated from 50% to 70%.
  • Detailed Browser Testing Documentation: Comprehensive documentation has been added, detailing the Playwright setup, the Express-based WebSocket test server, the interactive HTML test page, specific test coverage areas, relevant file paths, and new npm scripts for running browser tests.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@theturtle32 theturtle32 merged commit 140d9ed into v2 Oct 6, 2025
1 check passed
Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request provides a great update to the test modernization plan, clearly documenting the completion of the browser compatibility testing phase. The new sections are detailed and informative. I've made a few suggestions to correct some minor inconsistencies in the test count summaries and to improve the clarity of the npm script documentation. Overall, this is a solid documentation update.

Comment on lines +703 to +705
- `pnpm test:browser` - Run all browser tests
- `pnpm test:browser:chromium` - Run Chromium-only tests
- `pnpm test:browser:ui` - Run with interactive UI

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

For consistency and to avoid confusion for developers who might use a different package manager like npm or yarn, it's a good practice to either use the generic npm run command in documentation or just refer to the script name itself.

Suggested change
- `pnpm test:browser` - Run all browser tests
- `pnpm test:browser:chromium` - Run Chromium-only tests
- `pnpm test:browser:ui` - Run with interactive UI
- `npm run test:browser` - Run all browser tests
- `npm run test:browser:chromium` - Run Chromium-only tests
- `npm run test:browser:ui` - Run with interactive UI

Comment on lines 947 to 948
- Unit tests: 616 passing (+57 new tests)
- Integration tests: 35 passing

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

This test count breakdown seems to have a small inconsistency. The sum of the itemized tests (616 + 35 + 12 + 517 = 1180) doesn't match the section's total of 1,145. As other sections suggest the 35 integration tests are included in the 616 unit test count, this list appears to be double-counting them. To make this clearer, I suggest combining the unit and integration test lines.

Suggested change
- Unit tests: 616 passing (+57 new tests)
- Integration tests: 35 passing
- Unit/Integration tests: 616 passing (+57 new tests)

**Next Milestone:** Achieve 85%+ coverage, complete modernization plan
**Current Phase:** E2E Testing - Browser Compatibility
**Current Sprint:** Complete Phase 5 & Phase 6 remaining items
**Tests Passing:** 1,145/1,145 (100%) - 616 unit + 35 integration + 12 browser + 517 Autobahn

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

The test count breakdown on this line is inconsistent with the total. The sum of the parts (616 + 35 + 12 + 517 = 1180) doesn't match the stated total of 1,145. It appears the 35 integration tests are being double-counted. Clarifying that the 616 tests include both unit and integration tests would resolve this.

Suggested change
**Tests Passing:** 1,145/1,145 (100%) - 616 unit + 35 integration + 12 browser + 517 Autobahn
**Tests Passing:** 1,145/1,145 (100%) - 616 unit/integration + 12 browser + 517 Autobahn

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants