-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 603
Update test plan to reflect browser testing completion #491
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Phase 5.1 Browser Compatibility marked as complete with: - 12 Playwright browser tests implemented - Express-based WebSocket test server - Interactive HTML test page - Support for Chromium, Firefox, WebKit Overall progress: 85% → 88% Total tests: 1,133 → 1,145 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <[email protected]>
Summary of ChangesHello @theturtle32, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request updates the Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request provides a great update to the test modernization plan, clearly documenting the completion of the browser compatibility testing phase. The new sections are detailed and informative. I've made a few suggestions to correct some minor inconsistencies in the test count summaries and to improve the clarity of the npm script documentation. Overall, this is a solid documentation update.
| - `pnpm test:browser` - Run all browser tests | ||
| - `pnpm test:browser:chromium` - Run Chromium-only tests | ||
| - `pnpm test:browser:ui` - Run with interactive UI |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For consistency and to avoid confusion for developers who might use a different package manager like npm or yarn, it's a good practice to either use the generic npm run command in documentation or just refer to the script name itself.
| - `pnpm test:browser` - Run all browser tests | |
| - `pnpm test:browser:chromium` - Run Chromium-only tests | |
| - `pnpm test:browser:ui` - Run with interactive UI | |
| - `npm run test:browser` - Run all browser tests | |
| - `npm run test:browser:chromium` - Run Chromium-only tests | |
| - `npm run test:browser:ui` - Run with interactive UI |
| - Unit tests: 616 passing (+57 new tests) | ||
| - Integration tests: 35 passing |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This test count breakdown seems to have a small inconsistency. The sum of the itemized tests (616 + 35 + 12 + 517 = 1180) doesn't match the section's total of 1,145. As other sections suggest the 35 integration tests are included in the 616 unit test count, this list appears to be double-counting them. To make this clearer, I suggest combining the unit and integration test lines.
| - Unit tests: 616 passing (+57 new tests) | |
| - Integration tests: 35 passing | |
| - Unit/Integration tests: 616 passing (+57 new tests) |
| **Next Milestone:** Achieve 85%+ coverage, complete modernization plan | ||
| **Current Phase:** E2E Testing - Browser Compatibility | ||
| **Current Sprint:** Complete Phase 5 & Phase 6 remaining items | ||
| **Tests Passing:** 1,145/1,145 (100%) - 616 unit + 35 integration + 12 browser + 517 Autobahn |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The test count breakdown on this line is inconsistent with the total. The sum of the parts (616 + 35 + 12 + 517 = 1180) doesn't match the stated total of 1,145. It appears the 35 integration tests are being double-counted. Clarifying that the 616 tests include both unit and integration tests would resolve this.
| **Tests Passing:** 1,145/1,145 (100%) - 616 unit + 35 integration + 12 browser + 517 Autobahn | |
| **Tests Passing:** 1,145/1,145 (100%) - 616 unit/integration + 12 browser + 517 Autobahn |
Summary
Updates TEST_SUITE_MODERNIZATION_PLAN.md to reflect the completion of Phase 5.1 Browser Compatibility testing.
Updates:
Browser Testing Implementation:
Test plan
This is a documentation-only change. No code changes.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code