Skip to content

Conversation

jblespiau
Copy link

This is the equivalent of the internal cl/477929395

QuantumJaeYoo
QuantumJaeYoo previously approved these changes Oct 7, 2022
Copy link
Contributor

@QuantumJaeYoo QuantumJaeYoo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, but I think this change requires bumping up to the latest tensorflow in WORKSPACE & setup, etc. WDYT @MichaelBroughton ?

@jaeyoo
Copy link
Member

jaeyoo commented Oct 7, 2022

LGTM, but I think this change requires bumping up to the latest tensorflow in WORKSPACE & setup, etc. WDYT @MichaelBroughton ?

After discussion offline with PR author, confirmed that it's backward compatible. approved.

jaeyoo
jaeyoo previously approved these changes Oct 7, 2022
Copy link
Member

@jaeyoo jaeyoo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@jblespiau jblespiau dismissed stale reviews from jaeyoo and QuantumJaeYoo via 0502df4 October 7, 2022 08:15
@jaeyoo
Copy link
Member

jaeyoo commented Mar 20, 2023

#749 solves this PR together. closed.

@jaeyoo jaeyoo closed this Mar 20, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants