Skip to content

Conversation

@creachadair
Copy link
Contributor

A prerequisite for #194, which needs an updated Go toolchain version.

@creachadair creachadair merged commit 8882f27 into master Nov 8, 2021
@creachadair creachadair deleted the mjf/fix-build-container branch November 8, 2021 16:05
creachadair added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 8, 2021
In #195 I updated the Go version, and also swapped from Debian to Alpine for
the base image. This was OK for the build, but it turns out we also use the
same image to run golangci-lint. That action uses a binary for a different
architecture, which fails on this image.

So:
- Keep the Go version, but revert the base image.
- Add some documentation to the workflow configs.
creachadair added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 8, 2021
In #195 I updated the Go version, and also swapped from Debian to Alpine for
the base image. This was OK for the build, but it turns out we also use the
same image to run golangci-lint. That action uses a binary for a different
architecture, which fails on this image.

So:
- Keep the Go version, but revert the base image.
- Split image layers to make rebuilds faster.
- Add version labels as arguments.
- Add some documentation to the workflow configs.
creachadair added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 8, 2021
In #195 I updated the Go version, and also swapped from Debian to Alpine for
the base image. This was OK for the build, but it turns out we also use the
same image to run golangci-lint. That action uses a binary for a different
architecture, which fails on this image.

So:
- Keep the Go version, but revert the base image.
- Split image layers to make rebuilds faster.
- Add version labels as arguments.
- Add some documentation to the workflow configs.
creachadair added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 8, 2021
In #195 I updated the Go version, and also swapped from Debian to Alpine for
the base image. This was OK for the build, but it turns out we also use the
same image to run golangci-lint. That action uses a binary for a different
architecture, which fails on this image.

So:
- Keep the Go version, but revert the base image.
- Split image layers to make rebuilds faster.
- Add version labels as arguments.
- Add some documentation to the workflow configs.
creachadair pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 8, 2021
In #195 I updated the Go version, and also swapped from Debian to Alpine for
the base image. This was OK for the build, but it turns out we also use the
same image to run golangci-lint. That action uses a binary for a different
architecture, which fails on this image.

So:
- Keep the Go version, but revert the base image.
- Split image layers to make rebuilds faster.
- Add version labels as arguments.
- Add some documentation to the workflow configs.
creachadair pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 9, 2021
In #195 I updated the Go version, and also swapped from Debian to Alpine for
the base image. This was OK for the build, but it turns out we also use the
same image to run golangci-lint. That action uses a binary for a different
architecture, which fails on this image.

So:
- Keep the Go version, but revert the base image.
- Split image layers to make rebuilds faster.
- Add version labels as arguments.
- Add some documentation to the workflow configs.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants