-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10.6k
[AST] Replace type variables and placeholders in original ErrorTypes #82292
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion
2
...ompiler_crashers_2/cccd6394993ea4a2.swift → ...r_crashers_2_fixed/cccd6394993ea4a2.swift
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -1,3 +1,3 @@ | ||
| // {"signature":"swift::ErrorType::get(swift::Type)"} | ||
| // RUN: not --crash %target-swift-frontend -typecheck %s | ||
| // RUN: not %target-swift-frontend -typecheck %s | ||
| @convention(c) _->Int |
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just to note that this is indeed the long-term plan, we need to remove UnresolvedType in favor of PlaceholderType
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe we should limit this transformation to solver allocated placeholder types instead of all of them. We could also expand ErrorExpr originator and replace type variables with placeholders that point to ASTNode that their locator simplifies down to...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would rather apply the transform consistently to match what we do in
Solution::simplifyType, conditionalizing the logic on the allocation arena or originator seems a little odd to me. We should revisit this when we get rid of UnresolvedType though.Yeah maybe, I don't think there are any ErrorType consumers that currently really care about originators, but maybe that could be useful for debugging?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, I was mostly talking long-term as part of UnresolvedType removal :)