-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10.5k
Plumb native-clang-tools-path to build support. #81587
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
justice-adams-apple
merged 1 commit into
swiftlang:main
from
3405691582:plumb_clang_tools
Jun 30, 2025
Merged
Plumb native-clang-tools-path to build support. #81587
justice-adams-apple
merged 1 commit into
swiftlang:main
from
3405691582:plumb_clang_tools
Jun 30, 2025
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The build support Python libraries assume by default that if we do not supply a Swift toolchain path, we can find clang in the installed toolchain path: i.e., the clang that we just built. However, possibly during bootstrap, we may not have a preexisting Swift compiler but still want to use the clang on the platform that is already installed. build-script already gives us native-clang-tools-path. Here, we plumb this through to the relevant Python modules. If the native-clang-tools-path is not specified, we use the install_toolchain_path, just like native_toolchain_path, and the existing behavior is effectively unchanged. If we do specify a native-clang-tools-path, then we return it to ensure that we properly refer to the clang that lives there instead of always defaulting to the just-built clang.
@swift-ci please test. |
@swift-ci please test macOS platform. |
@swift-ci please test Linux platform. |
Ping. |
1 similar comment
Ping. |
justice-adams-apple
approved these changes
Jun 26, 2025
@justice-adams-apple can you merge on my behalf? I don't have permissions. Thank you! |
susmonteiro
pushed a commit
to susmonteiro/swift
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 2, 2025
The build support Python libraries assume by default that if we do not supply a Swift toolchain path, we can find clang in the installed toolchain path: i.e., the clang that we just built. However, possibly during bootstrap, we may not have a preexisting Swift compiler but still want to use the clang on the platform that is already installed. build-script already gives us native-clang-tools-path. Here, we plumb this through to the relevant Python modules. If the native-clang-tools-path is not specified, we use the install_toolchain_path, just like native_toolchain_path, and the existing behavior is effectively unchanged. If we do specify a native-clang-tools-path, then we return it to ensure that we properly refer to the clang that lives there instead of always defaulting to the just-built clang.
3405691582
added a commit
to 3405691582/swift
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 3, 2025
The build support Python libraries assume by default that if we do not supply a Swift toolchain path, we can find clang in the installed toolchain path: i.e., the clang that we just built. However, possibly during bootstrap, we may not have a preexisting Swift compiler but still want to use the clang on the platform that is already installed. build-script already gives us native-clang-tools-path. Here, we plumb this through to the relevant Python modules. If the native-clang-tools-path is not specified, we use the install_toolchain_path, just like native_toolchain_path, and the existing behavior is effectively unchanged. If we do specify a native-clang-tools-path, then we return it to ensure that we properly refer to the clang that lives there instead of always defaulting to the just-built clang.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The build support Python libraries assume by default that if we do not supply a Swift toolchain path, we can find clang in the installed toolchain path: i.e., the clang that we just built. However, possibly during bootstrap, we may not have a preexisting Swift compiler but still want to use the clang on the platform that is already installed.
build-script already gives us native-clang-tools-path. Here, we plumb this through to the relevant Python modules. If the native-clang-tools-path is not specified, we use the install_toolchain_path, just like native_toolchain_path, and the existing behavior is effectively unchanged. If we do specify a native-clang-tools-path, then we return it to ensure that we properly refer to the clang that lives there instead of always defaulting to the just-built clang.