[5.9] [Macros] Ensure that we find operators in any macro-expanded context. #68086
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
In any nominal declaration or extension thereof that is produced by a macro expansion, make sure we perform qualified name lookup when resolving operators so that we're guaranteed to find the macro-introduced operators. Otherwise, expanding a macro that defines a new type with conformances involving operators doesn't work. Fixes rdar://114257019,
Member
Author
|
@swift-ci please test |
DougGregor
changed the title
hborla
approved these changes
Aug 23, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
In any nominal declaration or extension thereof that is produced by a macro expansion, make sure we perform qualified name lookup when resolving operators so that we're guaranteed to find the macro-introduced operators. Otherwise, expanding a macro that defines a new type with conformances involving operators doesn't work.
Fixes rdar://114257019, cherry-picked from #68085