Skip to content

Conversation

LucianoPAlmeida
Copy link
Contributor

In those cases constraint type will be already resolved as ExistentialType which seems to make sense to just return it already.

Fixes #58920

@LucianoPAlmeida LucianoPAlmeida requested review from xedin and hborla May 23, 2022 03:22
@xedin xedin requested a review from CodaFi May 23, 2022 21:22
@LucianoPAlmeida LucianoPAlmeida force-pushed the existential-resolve branch 2 times, most recently from 25029ed to fd4d7c1 Compare May 24, 2022 05:24
@LucianoPAlmeida LucianoPAlmeida requested a review from hborla May 24, 2022 05:27
Copy link
Member

@hborla hborla left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you!

@LucianoPAlmeida
Copy link
Contributor Author

@swift-ci Please smoke test

@LucianoPAlmeida LucianoPAlmeida merged commit 3c0b1ab into swiftlang:main May 24, 2022
@LucianoPAlmeida LucianoPAlmeida deleted the existential-resolve branch May 24, 2022 12:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

No compiler error and abort trap when trying to create an existential type of another existential type
3 participants