Skip to content

Conversation

@slavapestov
Copy link
Contributor

@slavapestov slavapestov commented May 14, 2020

Note that rdar://problem/63191951 was actually fixed by #31992, and not this change as I expected. However, this change makes sense anyway, and this PR adds the missing test case.

@slavapestov

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The test should ideally be positive. Is there a visible difference in a loc attachment on either a debug_value or an alloc_stack that we could check for?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I didn't see one, in fact this test passes without my change, which is why I asked :) I'm not going to merge this in its current state.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do you perhaps see a difference with -verbose-sil? This also prints the non-debug-info relevant details of SILLocation.

@slavapestov slavapestov force-pushed the cloned-parameter-list-source-loc branch from bd96d04 to ffd92f9 Compare May 27, 2020 02:59
@slavapestov
Copy link
Contributor Author

@swift-ci Please smoke test

@slavapestov
Copy link
Contributor Author

@swift-ci Please smoke test macOS

@slavapestov
Copy link
Contributor Author

@swift-ci Please smoke test Linux

2 similar comments
@slavapestov
Copy link
Contributor Author

@swift-ci Please smoke test Linux

@slavapestov
Copy link
Contributor Author

@swift-ci Please smoke test Linux

@slavapestov
Copy link
Contributor Author

@swift-ci Please clean smoke test Linux

2 similar comments
@slavapestov
Copy link
Contributor Author

@swift-ci Please clean smoke test Linux

@slavapestov
Copy link
Contributor Author

@swift-ci Please clean smoke test Linux

@slavapestov slavapestov merged commit 71b2c50 into swiftlang:master Jun 2, 2020
@compnerd
Copy link
Member

compnerd commented Jun 2, 2020

This seems to have introduced a regression on the windows builds:

https://ci-external.swift.org/job/oss-swift-windows-x86_64-vs2019/1538/changes#detail

Failing Tests (1):
    Swift(windows-x86_64) :: DebugInfo/curry_thunk.swift

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants